Validating Modern NRG Oncology Pelvic Nodal and Groupe Francophone de Radiotherapie Urologique Prostate Bed Contouring Guidelines for Post-Prostatectomy Salvage Radiation: A Secondary Analysis of the LOCATE Trial

被引:15
作者
Harmon, Grant [1 ]
Chan, Dennis [1 ]
Lee, Brian [1 ]
Miller, Chelsea [2 ]
Gorbonos, Alex [3 ]
Gupta, Gopal [3 ]
Quek, Marcus [3 ]
Woods, Michael [3 ]
Savir-Baruch, Bital [4 ]
Harkenrider, Matthew M. [1 ]
Solanki, Abhishek A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Stritch Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Loyola Univ, Stritch Sch Med, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Loyola Univ, Stritch Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2021年 / 111卷 / 05期
关键词
CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; METASTATIC PATTERNS; CANCER; RECURRENCE; THERAPY; CONSENSUS; TOMOGRAPHY; DISSECTION; PHASE-3;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We used the patterns of recurrence on F-18-fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) in patients enrolled in the LOCATE trial after prostatectomy to evaluate how well the most recent NRG Oncology and Groupe Francophone de Radiotherapie Urologique (GFRU) contouring recommendations encompassed all sites of recurrence in the prostate fossa and pelvic nodes in comparison to former Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommendations. Methods and Materials: Patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy with a positive finding within the prostate fossa or pelvic nodes on F-18-fluciclovine PET/CTs were identified from the LOCATE patient population. Areas of gross disease were delineated. Prostate fossa contours were delineated using both the 2010 RTOG consensus guidelines and the recently published 2020 GFRU consensus guidelines. Pelvic nodes were contoured with both the 2009 RTOG consensus guidelines and the 2020 NRG consensus guidelines. The performance of the contouring guidelines was assessed by determining what proportion of gross recurrent lesions were encompassed completely or marginally. Results: Of the 213 patients within the LOCATE trial, 45 patients were eligible for analysis with positive F-18-fluciclovine PET findings. Of the 30 total prostate fossa recurrences, the 2010 RTOG contour covered 20 (67%) and missed or marginally covered 10 (33%). The 2020 GFRU contour covered 27 recurrences (90%), and missed or marginally covered 3 (10%). Of the 43 total nodal recurrences, the 2009 RTOG pelvic nodal contour covered 29 nodes (67%), and missed or marginally covered 14 (32%). The 2020 NRG pelvic nodal contour covered 43 nodes (100%), with no misses or marginal coverage. Conclusions: This secondary analysis of the LOCATE trial exemplifies the improved coverage of the latest prostate fossa contouring recommendations from the GFRU. Similarly, it also validates the updated 2020 NRG pelvic nodal contouring guidelines by demonstrating improved coverage of recurrent disease in this patient population. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1195 / 1203
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-Fluciclovine on the Treatment of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Results from the LOCATE Trial
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Kostakoglu, Lale
    Chau, Albert
    Duan, Fenghai
    Mahmood, Umar
    Mankoff, David A.
    Schuster, David M.
    Siegel, Barry A.
    Adler, Lee P.
    Belkoff, Laurence H.
    Burzon, Daniel
    Dato, Paul
    Farwell, Michael
    Fogelson, Stephen
    Gardiner, Peter
    Hanna, Lucy
    Hoffman, John M.
    Intenzo, Charles
    Josephson, David
    Kaminetsky, Jed
    Kipper, Michael
    Krynyckyi, Borys
    Linder, Karen E.
    Marques, Helga
    Melnick, John
    Miller, Matthew P.
    Oh, William
    Philips, Shaile
    Rose, Judith
    Savir-Baruch, Bital
    Stevens, Daniel J.
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    Twardowski, Przemyslaw
    Ward, Penelope
    Wasserman, Martha
    Weick, Sharon
    Yu, Jian Q.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (02) : 322 - 330
  • [2] Multisite Experience of the Safety, Detection Rate and Diagnostic Performance of Fluciclovine (18F) Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Imaging in the Staging of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Bach-Gansmo, Tore
    Nanni, Cristina
    Nieh, Peter T.
    Zanoni, Lucia
    Bogsrud, Tronde Velde
    Sletten, Heidi
    Korsan, Katrine Andersen
    Kieboom, J.
    Tade, Funmilayo I.
    Odewole, Oluwaseun
    Chau, Albert
    Ward, Penelope
    Goodman, Mark M.
    Fanti, Stefano
    Schuster, David M.
    Willoch, Frode
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (03) : 676 - 682
  • [3] Lymphatic spread of nodal metastases in high-risk prostate cancer: The ascending pathway from the pelvis to the retroperitoneum
    Briganti, Alberto
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Capogrosso, Paolo
    Passoni, Niccolo
    Freschi, Massimo
    di Trapani, Ettore
    Gallina, Andrea
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Abdollah, Firas
    Tutolo, Manuela
    Bianchi, Marco
    Salonia, Andrea
    Da Pozzo, Luigi Filippo
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2012, 72 (02) : 186 - 192
  • [4] Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer:: An autopsy study of 1,589 patients
    Bubendorf, L
    Schöpfer, A
    Wagner, U
    Sauter, G
    Moch, H
    Willi, N
    Gasser, TC
    Mihatsch, MJ
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2000, 31 (05) : 578 - 583
  • [5] Factors influencing prostate cancer patterns of care: An analysis of treatment variation using the SEER database
    Burt, Lindsay M.
    Shrieve, Dennis C.
    Tward, Jonathan D.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 3 (02) : 170 - 180
  • [6] 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: a prospective, single-centre, single-arm, comparative imaging trial
    Calais, Jeremie
    Ceci, Francesco
    Eiber, Matthias
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Rischpler, Christoph
    Bach-Gansmo, Tore
    Nanni, Cristina
    Savir-Baruch, Bital
    Elashoff, David
    Grogan, Tristan
    Dahlbom, Magnus
    Slavik, Roger
    Gartmann, Jeannine
    Nguyen, Kathleen
    Lok, Vincent
    Jadvar, Hossein
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Rettig, Matthew B.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Czernin, Johannes
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (09) : 1286 - 1294
  • [7] Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla to assess local recurrence following radical prostatectomy using T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging
    Cirillo, Stefano
    Petracchini, Massimo
    Scotti, Lorenza
    Gallo, Teresa
    Macera, Annalisa
    Bona, Maria Cristina
    Ortega, Cinzia
    Gabriele, Pietro
    Regge, Daniele
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 761 - 769
  • [8] Clinicaltrials.gov, PSMA BAS 18F DCFPYL
  • [9] Local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Characteristics in size, location, and relationship to prostate-specific antigen and surgical margins
    Connolly, JA
    Shinohara, K
    Presti, JC
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (02) : 225 - 231
  • [10] Benefits of Elective Para-Aortic Radiotherapy for pN1 Prostate Cancer Using Arc Therapy (Intensity-Modulated or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy): Protocol for a Nonrandomized Phase II Trial
    Draulans, Cedric
    Joniau, Steven
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Delrue, Louke
    Decaestecker, Karel
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Dirix, Piet
    Van den Bergh, Laura
    Crijns, Wouter
    Vandendriessche, Hans
    Van Wynsberge, Lodewijk
    Ost, Piet
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Buelens, Pieterjan
    Haustermans, Karin
    Berghen, Charlien
    De Meerleer, Gert
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2018, 7 (12):