Life cycle analysis of direct and indirect coal liquefaction for vehicle power in China

被引:40
作者
Gao, Dan [1 ]
Ye, Chao [1 ]
Ren, Xiangkun [2 ]
Zhang, Yuning [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Energy Power & Mech Engn, Key Lab Condit Monitoring & Control Power Plant E, Minist Educ, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Sanju Environm Protect & New Mat Co Ltd, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coal chemical engineering; Life cycle analysis; Coal liquefaction; Coal-to-liquid; Energy efficiency; Production costs; RENEWABLE ENERGY-SOURCES; HYDROGEN-TRANSFER; ASSESSMENT LCA; CONSUMPTION; METHANOL; IMPACTS; BUBBLES; SYSTEMS; FUELS; STAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.09.007
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
In the present paper, life cycle analysis of several typical coal liquefaction technical routes for vehicle power in China is performed with full considerations of environmental pollutants (e.g. SO2 and NOx), greenhouse gas emissions, costs, and energy efficiency. Direct and indirect coal liquefactions are discussed in detail with comparisons of several different technical routes (e.g. different transportation methods and liquefaction factory locations). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis of three direct coal liquefaction routes is performed with a focus on the transportation distance and vehicle internal combustion engine efficiency. Our analysis shows that the direct coal liquefaction with railway distribution is the best technical route among all the routes investigated, which could significantly reduce the emissions of CO2, the production costs with acceptable energy efficiency. Generally speaking, the coal liquefaction factory should be located at the coal mining area to minimize the costs of products.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 49
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Ethylic or methylic route to soybean biodiesel? Tracking environmental answers through life cycle assessment [J].
Alejos Altamirano, Carlos Alberto ;
Yokoyama, Lidia ;
de Medeiros, Jose Luiz ;
Fernandes Araujo, Ofelia de Queiroz .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 :1246-1263
[3]   Are district heating systems and renewable energy sources always an environmental win-win solution? A life cycle assessment case study in Tuscany, Italy [J].
Bartolozzi, Irene ;
Rizzi, Francesco ;
Frey, Marco .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 :408-420
[4]   The influence of catalysts on biofuel life cycle analysis (LCA) [J].
Benavides, Pahola Thathiana ;
Cronauer, Donald C. ;
Adom, Felix ;
Wang, Zhichao ;
Dunn, Jennifer B. .
SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 11 :53-59
[5]   Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review [J].
Cabeza, Luisa F. ;
Rincon, Lidia ;
Vilarino, Virginia ;
Perez, Gabriel ;
Castell, Albert .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 :394-416
[6]  
Cao X., 2014, FOREST ENG, V30, P154
[7]   Pathways for hydrogen infrastructure development in China: Integrated assessment for vehicle fuels and a case study of Beijing [J].
Chang, Le ;
Li, Zheng ;
Gao, Dan ;
Huang, He ;
Ni, Weidou .
ENERGY, 2007, 32 (11) :2023-2037
[8]   Environmental life cycle analysis of a water pumping and desalination process powered by intermittent renewable energy sources [J].
Cherif, Habib ;
Champenois, Gerard ;
Belhadj, Jamel .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 59 :1504-1513
[9]  
China Coal Market Online,, 2017, FOR COAL IND DEV PRI
[10]  
China Electricity Council, 2016, ANN DEV REP CHIN ELE