Hamstring Graft Incorporation According to the Length of the Graft Inside Tunnels

被引:38
作者
Cavaignac, Etienne [1 ]
Marot, Vincent [1 ]
Faruch, Marie [1 ,2 ]
Reina, Nicolas [1 ]
Murgier, Jerome [1 ]
Accadbled, Franck [1 ,3 ]
Berard, Emilie [1 ,4 ]
Chiron, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Pierre Paul Riquet, Dept Orthoped Surg & Trauma, Rue Jean Dausset, F-3105 Toulouse, France
[2] Ctr Hosp Univ Toulouse, Dept Radiol, Toulouse, France
[3] Hop Enfants, Dept Orthoped Surg, Toulouse, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Toulouse, Univ Toulouse 3, INSERM, Dept Epidemiol Hlth Econ & Publ Hlth,UMR1027, Toulouse, France
关键词
ACL reconstruction; ST4; ligamentization; graft incorporation; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; RESONANCE-IMAGING EVALUATION; 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; TENDON AUTOGRAFTS; GRACILIS TENDON; PATELLAR TENDON; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; SEMITENDINOSUS;
D O I
10.1177/0363546517733472
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a quadrupled semitendinosus (ST4) graft is an evolution of the standard technique with 2 hamstring tendons (semitendinosus + gracilis [STG]). However, there is no published comparison of how well these 2 types of hamstring grafts are incorporated into the bone tunnels. Because the ST4 graft is shorter, there is less graft material inside the tunnels. Purpose: To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare graft incorporation in the tibial bone tunnels 1 year after ACL reconstruction with either an STG graft or ST4 graft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Sixty-two patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were enrolled prospectively: 31 with an ST4 graft and 31 with an STG graft. The same surgical technique, fixation method, and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. Graft incorporation and ligamentization were evaluated with MRI after 1 year of follow-up. The following parameters were evaluated: signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ), tibial tunnel enlargement, signal intensity at the bone-graft interface, and graft signal according to the Howell scale. The number of participants needed to show that the mean SNQ did not differ between the 2 techniques was 31 in each group (with a 1-sided alpha of 2.5% and a 1-sided beta of 10.0%). The Student t test was used to compare the distribution of continuous secondary endpoints. Results: The mean SNQ was 5.2 4.5 for the STG group and 5.9 +/- 3.7 for the ST4 group (P = .5100). The mean tibial tunnel widening was 93.7% +/- 51.7% for the STG group versus 80.0% +/- 42.9% for the ST4 group (P = .2605). The groups did not differ in signal intensity at the bone-graft interface (P = .7502) or in graft signal according to the Howell scale (P = .4544). Conclusion: At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, incorporation and ligamentization of the STG and ST4 grafts were the same based on MRI analysis. The results were at least as good with the ST4 technique as with the standard STG technique in terms of incorporation and ligamentization.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 356
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Harvesting hamstring tendons for ACL reconstruction influences postoperative hamstring muscle performance [J].
Adachi, N ;
Ochi, M ;
Uchio, Y ;
Sakai, Y ;
Kuriwaka, M ;
Fujihara, A .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2003, 123 (09) :460-465
[2]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Hamstring Tendon Autografts Comparison of Remnant Bundle Preservation and Standard Technique [J].
Ahn, Jin Hwan ;
Lee, Sang Hak ;
Choi, Sang Hee ;
Lim, Tae Kang .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (09) :1768-1777
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[4]   Hamstring Strength Recovery After Hamstring Tendon Harvest for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Graft Types [J].
Ardern, Clare L. ;
Webster, Kate E. ;
Taylor, Nicholas F. ;
Feller, Julian A. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2010, 26 (04) :462-469
[5]   Hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: does gracilis tendon harvest matter? [J].
Barenius, Bjorn ;
Webster, Webster Kate ;
McClelland, Jodie ;
Feller, Julian .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) :207-212
[6]   Analysis of biomechanical properties of patellar ligament graft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft [J].
Biuk, Egon ;
Zelic, Zoran ;
Rapan, Sasa ;
Curic, Goran ;
Biuk, Dubravka ;
Radic, Radivoje .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 :S14-S17
[7]   Transient laxity of an anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee related to pregnancy [J].
Blecher, AM ;
Richmond, JC .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1998, 14 (01) :77-79
[8]   The Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Lysholm Score and Tegner Activity Scale for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the Knee [J].
Briggs, Karen K. ;
Lysholm, Jack ;
Tegner, Yelverton ;
Rodkey, William G. ;
Kocher, Mininder S. ;
Steadman, J. Richard .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (05) :890-897
[9]   Can the gracilis be used to replace the anterior cruciate ligament in the knee? A cadaver study [J].
Cavaignac, Etienne ;
Pailhe, Regis ;
Murgier, Jerome ;
Reina, Nicolas ;
Lauwers, Frederic ;
Chiron, Philippe .
KNEE, 2014, 21 (06) :1014-1017
[10]  
Chen Chih-Hwa, 2009, Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol, V1, P21, DOI 10.1186/1758-2555-1-21