An investigation of mandibular asymmetry and associated soft-tissue characteristics among adults: A digitalized orthopantomographic and photographs assessment

被引:0
作者
Ajwa, Nancy [1 ]
Ababtain, Nora [2 ]
Alsulaiman, Daniyah [2 ]
Alotaibi, Shahad [2 ]
Alqahtani, Maram [2 ]
Alzahrani, Khames [3 ]
机构
[1] Riyadh Elm Univ, Prevent Dent Dept, Coll Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Riyadh Elm Univ, Coll Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Minist Hlth, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Mandibular; Asymmetry; Soft-Tissue; Assessment; Orthopantomography; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; CEPHALOMETRIC INDEXES; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: There are many controversies behind the topic of mandibular asymmetry. Conflicts include: gender predilection, soft tissue correlation and what is considered normal asymmetry. Consequently, this study was done to investigate the prevalence and severity of mandibular asymmetry among adults in a sample from orthodontic clinics and to assess the soft tissue correlation and gender predilection. Methods: Mandibular asymmetry was investigated on a standardized digitalized orthopantomograms of 793 adults attending Riyadh Elm University, orthodontic clinic following strict eligibility criteria. This study started in July 2020 to October 2021. Asymmetry index (AI) used to analyze the prevalence and gender incidence. Soft tissue assessment for 87 of the mandibular asymmetric participants was done on a standardized photograph checking the soft tissue correlation measuring the area, perimeter and compactness for the two sides of the lower third of the face. The resulted ratios correlated with (AI). Both radiographic and photographic assessment was done on AutoCAD LT 2021 software (version R.46.M.1748). Results: Considering participants of 3% or greater in Asymmetry Index (AI) as asymmetric. Therefore; 20.9% of males' subjects represent mandibular asymmetry, while the incidence in females was only 13.69%. Moreover, there's no significant link between hard and soft tissue asymmetry, the correlation (r) between Asymmetric index (AI) and area ratio (AR) was recorded as .062 indicating a weak positive relationship. Conclusion: Ultimately, it can be concluded that soft tissue is not associated with hard tissue asymmetry. Moreover, Radiographic based mandibular asymmetry showed high prevalence rate in both adult genders with higher incidence in males.
引用
收藏
页码:3157 / 3166
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Masuoka N, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P651
  • [22] Discriminative thresholds of cephalometric indexes in the subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry
    Masuoka, Naoya
    Muramatsu, Atsushi
    Ariji, Yoshiko
    Nawa, Hiroyuki
    Goto, Shigemi
    Ariji, Eiichiro
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 131 (05) : 609 - 613
  • [23] McCrea Shane J, 2018, Ann Maxillofac Surg, V8, P254, DOI 10.4103/ams.ams_293_13
  • [25] Mandibular dimensional changes and skeletal maturity
    Subramaniam, Priya
    Naidu, Premila
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2010, 1 (04) : 218 - 222
  • [26] Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients
    Thiesen, Guilherme
    Gribel, Bruno F.
    Freitas, Maria Perpetua M.
    Oliver, Donald R.
    Kim, Ki Beom
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2018, 88 (05) : 545 - 551
  • [27] Thiesen Guilherme, 2015, Dental Press J. Orthod., V20, P110
  • [28] Mandibular buccal shelf and infrazygomatic crest thicknesses in patients with different vertical facial heights
    Vargas, Eduardo Otero Amaral
    Lima, Rodrigo Lopes de
    Nojima, Lincoln Issamu
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 158 (03) : 349 - 356
  • [29] Facial surface morphology predicts variation in internal skeletal shape
    Young, Nathan M.
    Sherathiya, Krunal
    Gutierrez, Luis
    Nguyen, Emerald
    Bekmezian, Sona
    Huang, John C.
    Hallgrimsson, Benedikt
    Lee, Janice S.
    Marcucio, Ralph S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 149 (04) : 501 - 508