An investigation of mandibular asymmetry and associated soft-tissue characteristics among adults: A digitalized orthopantomographic and photographs assessment

被引:0
作者
Ajwa, Nancy [1 ]
Ababtain, Nora [2 ]
Alsulaiman, Daniyah [2 ]
Alotaibi, Shahad [2 ]
Alqahtani, Maram [2 ]
Alzahrani, Khames [3 ]
机构
[1] Riyadh Elm Univ, Prevent Dent Dept, Coll Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Riyadh Elm Univ, Coll Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Minist Hlth, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Mandibular; Asymmetry; Soft-Tissue; Assessment; Orthopantomography; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; CEPHALOMETRIC INDEXES; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: There are many controversies behind the topic of mandibular asymmetry. Conflicts include: gender predilection, soft tissue correlation and what is considered normal asymmetry. Consequently, this study was done to investigate the prevalence and severity of mandibular asymmetry among adults in a sample from orthodontic clinics and to assess the soft tissue correlation and gender predilection. Methods: Mandibular asymmetry was investigated on a standardized digitalized orthopantomograms of 793 adults attending Riyadh Elm University, orthodontic clinic following strict eligibility criteria. This study started in July 2020 to October 2021. Asymmetry index (AI) used to analyze the prevalence and gender incidence. Soft tissue assessment for 87 of the mandibular asymmetric participants was done on a standardized photograph checking the soft tissue correlation measuring the area, perimeter and compactness for the two sides of the lower third of the face. The resulted ratios correlated with (AI). Both radiographic and photographic assessment was done on AutoCAD LT 2021 software (version R.46.M.1748). Results: Considering participants of 3% or greater in Asymmetry Index (AI) as asymmetric. Therefore; 20.9% of males' subjects represent mandibular asymmetry, while the incidence in females was only 13.69%. Moreover, there's no significant link between hard and soft tissue asymmetry, the correlation (r) between Asymmetric index (AI) and area ratio (AR) was recorded as .062 indicating a weak positive relationship. Conclusion: Ultimately, it can be concluded that soft tissue is not associated with hard tissue asymmetry. Moreover, Radiographic based mandibular asymmetry showed high prevalence rate in both adult genders with higher incidence in males.
引用
收藏
页码:3157 / 3166
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ATHANASIOU A E, 1989, International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, V4, P239
  • [2] Bailey L J, 2001, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V16, P280
  • [3] Ideal Facial Relationships and Goals
    Bueller, Hope
    [J]. FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 34 (05) : 458 - 465
  • [4] Burstone C J, 1998, Semin Orthod, V4, P153, DOI 10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80017-0
  • [5] Cheong You-Wei, 2011, Chang Gung Med J, V34, P341
  • [6] Chia M S., 2008, Orthodontic Update, V1, P44, DOI [DOI 10.12968/ORTU.2008.1.2.44, DOI 10.12968/ortu.2008.1.2.44]
  • [7] Three-dimensional evaluation of midfacial asymmetry in patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate by cone-beam computed tomography
    Choi, Youn-Kyung
    Park, Soo-Byung
    Kim, Yong-Il
    Son, Woo-Sung
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2013, 43 (03) : 113 - 119
  • [8] Evaluation of facial soft tissue thickness in symmetric and asymmetric subjects with the use of cone-beam computed tomography
    de Lima, Lilian Siqueira
    Brunetto, Daniel Paludo
    Goncalves Nojima, Matilde da Cunha
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 155 (02) : 216 - 223
  • [9] The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics
    Faure, JC
    Rieffe, C
    Maltha, JC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2002, 24 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [10] The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: A cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood
    Ferrario, VF
    Sforza, C
    Ciusa, V
    Dellavia, C
    Tartaglia, GM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 59 (04) : 382 - 388