Utilization of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Emergency Management

被引:0
作者
Caylor, Justine P. [1 ]
Hammel, Robert J., II [1 ]
机构
[1] Towson Univ, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Towson, MD 21252 USA
来源
COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS | 2021年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making; emergency management; artificial intelligence; social vulnerability index; AHP; TOPSIS; COVID-19; IMPACT;
D O I
10.13053/CyS-25-4-4102
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
When emergencies or disasters strike, decision-making is a critical component in emergency management. One area of emergency management is ensuring that vulnerable communities are identified and can get the aid they need before, during, and after emergency events. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be leveraged to improve decision-making in dynamic and complex situations. We propose that Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), specifically a hybrid methodology of AHP-TOPSIS, is an approach that can be utilized in AI that can help evaluate, prioritize, and select the most favorable alternative based on computation of the criteria. A study was conducted considering the positive COVID-19 cases in randomly selected counties in three states - Texas, California, and Oklahoma - that have historically experienced the most declared emergencies. The empirical results from the three cases (one case for each state) demonstrate the superiority of the AHP-TOPSIS approach.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 872
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   A hybrid and integrated approach to evaluate and prevent disasters [J].
Ishizaka, Alessio ;
Labib, Ashraf .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (10) :1475-1489
[22]  
James N, 2020, LOC SIT EFF GROUND F, P251
[23]   Integrated ANN-cross-validation and AHP-TOPSIS model to improve earthquake risk assessment [J].
Jena, Ratiranjan ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 50
[24]   The Impact of Social Vulnerability on COVID-19 in the US: An Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships [J].
Karaye, Ibraheem M. ;
Horney, Jennifer A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (03) :317-325
[25]  
Kendall MG, 1938, BIOMETRIKA, V30, P81, DOI 10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81
[26]   A review of mathematical modeling, artificial intelligence and datasets used in the study, prediction and management of COVID-19 [J].
Mohamadou, Youssoufa ;
Halidou, Aminou ;
Kapen, Pascalin Tiam .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 50 (11) :3913-3925
[27]   Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS [J].
Opricovic, S ;
Tzeng, GH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 156 (02) :445-455
[28]   Fuzzy MCDM Model for Risk Factor Selection in Construction Projects [J].
Rezakhani, Pejman .
ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2012, 16 (05) :79-93
[29]  
Ribeiro R. A, 2011, WORLD C SOFT COMP
[30]  
Saaty T.L., 1990, DECISION MAKING LEAD