Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas

被引:34
作者
Chikarmane, Sona A. [1 ,2 ]
Michaels, Aya Y. [1 ]
Giess, Catherine S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Imaging, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
breast; clustered ring enhancement; MRI; nonmass enhancement; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; T2-WEIGHTED IMAGES; LESIONS; CANCER; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MALIGNANCY; RISK;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18086
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency of reclassification of nonmass enhancement (NME) as background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and to determine positive predictive values (PPVs) of NME descriptors using the revised BI-RADS atlas. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review of our institution's MRI database from January 1, 2009, through March 30, 2012, identified 6220 contrast-enhanced breast MRI examinations. All findings prospectively assessed as NME and rated as BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5 (n = 386) were rereviewed in consensus by two radiologists who were blinded to pathologic findings with the fifth edition of the BI-RADS lexicon. Findings considered as postsurgical, associated with known cancers, NME given a BI-RADS category 3 assessment before 2009, previously biopsied, and those reclassified as BPE, focus, or mass were excluded (n = 181). Medical records were reviewed for demographics and outcomes. RESULTS. Two hundred five women were included (mean age, 48.8 years; range, 21-84 years). Seventy-seven of 386 findings (20.0%) were reclassified as BPE, and patients with BPE were younger than those with NME (mean age, 43.9 years; range, 31-62 years) (p = 0.003). Pathology results for 144 of 205 (70.2%) patients included 52 malignant, 11 high-risk, and 81 benign lesions. The highest PPVs for distribution patterns were 34.5% (10/29) for segmental and 100.0% (3/3) for diffuse distribution. The highest PPVs for internal enhancement patterns were 36.7% (11/30) for clustered ring enhancement and 27.5% (11/40) for clumped enhancement. No difference for NME malignancy rate was noted according to BPE (10/52 [19.2%] marked or moderate; 42/153 [27.5%] mild or minimal, p = 0.24). Thirty-two percent (17/52) of malignant NMEs had high T2 signal. CONCLUSION. Careful assessment of findings as BPE versus NME can improve PPVs, particularly in younger women. Although clustered ring enhancement had one of the study's highest PPVs, this number falls below previously published rates. Reliance on T2 signal as a benign feature may be misleading, because one-third of malignancies had T2 signal.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1184
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Nonmass Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast: Additional T2-Weighted Images Improve Diagnostic Accuracy [J].
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Dietzel, Matthias ;
Kaiser, Werner A. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (03) :361-366
[2]   Updates and Revisions to the BI-RADS Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lexicon [J].
Edwards, Sonya D. ;
Lipson, Jafi A. ;
Ikeda, Debra M. ;
Lee, Janie M. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (03) :483-+
[3]   Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Breast MR Imaging: Normal Patterns, Diagnostic Challenges, and Potential for False-Positive and False-Negative Interpretation [J].
Giess, Catherine S. ;
Yeh, Eren D. ;
Raza, Sughra ;
Birdwell, Robyn L. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2014, 34 (01) :234-U293
[4]   Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition [J].
Kriege, M ;
Brekelmans, CTM ;
Boetes, C ;
Besnard, PE ;
Zonderland, HM ;
Obdeijn, IM ;
Manoliu, RA ;
Kok, T ;
Peterse, H ;
Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA ;
Muller, SH ;
Meijer, S ;
Oosterwijk, JC ;
Beex, LVAM ;
Tollenaar, RAEM ;
de Koning, HJ ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Klijn, JGM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (05) :427-437
[5]   Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Schrading, S ;
Leutner, CC ;
Morakkabati-Spitz, N ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Fimmers, R ;
Kuhn, W ;
Schild, HH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (33) :8469-8476
[6]   Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Schmutzler, RK ;
Leutner, CC ;
Kempe, A ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Hocke, A ;
Maringa, M ;
Pfeifer, U ;
Krebs, D ;
Schild, HH .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (01) :267-279
[7]   Role of MRI in screening women at high risk for breast cancer [J].
Lehman, Constance D. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 24 (05) :964-970
[8]   Descriptors of Malignant Non-mass Enhancement of Breast MRI: Their Correlation to the Presence of Invasion [J].
Machida, Youichi ;
Shimauchi, Akiko ;
Tozaki, Mitsuhiro ;
Kuroki, Yoshifumi ;
Yoshida, Tamiko ;
Fukuma, Ei'suke .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (06) :687-695
[9]  
Mendelson EB., 2013, ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, V5th ed
[10]   Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI [J].
Sakamoto, Naomi ;
Tozaki, Mitsuhiro ;
Higa, Kuniki ;
Tsunoda, Yuko ;
Ogawa, Tomoko ;
Abe, Satoko ;
Ozaki, Shinji ;
Sakamoto, Masaaki ;
Tsuruhara, Tomoko ;
Kawano, Naoko ;
Suzuki, Takako ;
Yamashiro, Norie ;
Fukuma, Eisuke .
BREAST CANCER, 2008, 15 (03) :241-246