Healthcare provider knowledge, attitudes, and preferences in management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in the Mid-South

Objective: This study explored the clinical management practices of healthcare providers who treat menopausal women in an urban Mid-South area. The study specifically examined their knowledge of prescribing and counseling related to the care of women who present with complaints or clinical findings of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Methods: An electronic questionnaire was distributed to healthcare providers involved in the care of women undergoing menopausal transition spanning a variety of medical specialties. The questionnaire was distributed to academic program directors, coordinators, and ListServ administrators to forward to targeted respondents. Items included demographic questions, clinical knowledge, management practices, and preferences. Statistical analysis for associations between demographics was performed using Chi-squared tests and between age groups with Kruskal Wallis tests. Results: The final sample contained 106 healthcare providers. Respondents were demographically diverse and encompassed multiple levels of professional training including Attendings, Trainees (Residents and Fellows), as well as Advanced Practice Registered Nurses. Significant differences were noted in many areas examined in our questionnaire, comprising knowledge, management, counseling, and prescribing practices surrounding the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause when accounting for training level, specialty, and years in practice. Among all respondents, 10.4% reported rarely or never discussing menopausal symptoms with their patients. Most respondents (76.4%) stated they had prescribed topical therapies for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, with over 90% of practitioners prescribing lubricants/moisturizers and estradiol cream; however, only 55% reported being familiar with the US Food and Drug Administration's boxed warning on low-dose vaginal estrogen. Nearly half of the respondents (49%) reported being uncomfortable counseling about the boxed warning on low-dose vaginal estrogen. Conclusion: This study identifies gaps in Mid-South healthcare providers' awareness of the boxed warning on low-dose vaginal estrogen as well as their comfort level in providing counseling regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives to vaginal estrogen. Integrated practice between physicians and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses can lead to a significant benefit to patients experiencing menopause as shared experience and knowledge are shared between each group. Our survey does reveal gaps in knowledge and practice for optimal outcomes for patients experiencing genitourinary syndrome of menopause. These results will be useful in providing continuing education to providers and more effective communication, evaluation, and treatment to patients.