The quasi-static response of compliant prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees using finite element methods

被引:47
作者
Faustini, MC [1 ]
Neptune, RR [1 ]
Crawford, RH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Dept Mech Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
amputee; design; prosthetic sockets; compliance; finite element analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.04.019
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The finite element method (FEM) is a very powerful tool for analyzing the behavior of structures, especially when the geometry and mechanics are too complex to be modeled with analytical methods. This study focuses on the analysis of patellar tendon bearing prosthetic sockets with integrated compliant features designed to relieve contact pressure between the residual limb and socket. We developed a FEM model composed of a socket, liner and residual limb and analyzed it under quasi-static loading conditions derived from experimentally measured ground reaction forces. The geometry of the residual limb, liner and socket were acquired from computed tomography (CT) data of a transtibial amputee. Three different compliant designs were analyzed using FEM to assess the structural integrity of the sockets and their ability to relieve local pressure at the fibula head during normal walking. The compliant features consisted of thin-wall sections and two variations of spiral slots integrated within the socket wall. One version of the spiral slots produced the largest pressure relief, with an average reduction in local interface pressure during single-lea stance (20-80% of the stance phase) from 172 to 66.4 kPa or 65.8% compared to a baseline socket with no compliant features. These results suggest that the integration of local compliant features is an effective method to reduce local contact pressure and improve the functional performance of prosthetic sockets. (c) 2005 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 121
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Beaman JJ, 1997, Solid Freeform Fabrication: A New Direction in Manufacturing
[2]  
Convery P, 1998, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V22, P193
[3]  
FAUSTINI MC, 2004, THESIS U TEXAS AUSTI
[4]  
FISHER C, 1999, P 4 INT S COMP METH
[5]   Load transfer mechanics between trans-tibial prosthetic socket and residual limb - dynamic effects [J].
Jia, XH ;
Zhang, M ;
Lee, WCC .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 37 (09) :1371-1377
[6]   Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket [J].
Lee, WCC ;
Zhang, M ;
Jia, XH ;
Cheung, JTM .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2004, 26 (08) :655-662
[7]  
Silver-Thorn M B, 1999, IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng, V7, P268, DOI 10.1109/86.788464
[8]  
Silver-Thorn MB, 2002, J REHABIL RES DEV, V39, P597
[9]  
SIMPSON G, 2001, TECHNICAL PAPERS ISA, V408, P343
[10]  
Zachariah S G, 1996, IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng, V4, P91, DOI 10.1109/86.506406