EVALUATION OF THE CONTENT AND PROCESS OF INFORMED CONSENT DISCUSSIONS FOR NEONATAL RESEARCH

被引:4
|
作者
Marc-Aurele, Krishelle L. [1 ]
Steinman, Sara L.
Ransom, Kelly M. [2 ]
Finer, Neil N.
Dunn, Laura B. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Neonatol, Dept Pediat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Fielding Grad Univ, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
neonatology; informed consent; medical ethics; research subjects; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; LEUKEMIA TRIALS; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.78
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
STUDIES OF INFORMED CONSENT FOR neonatal research suggest that there are gaps in parental understanding of key aspects of research. Few studies have examined parental understanding and investigator disclosure simultaneously. This pilot study evaluated the content and processes of 21 audio-recorded consent discussions with parents of eligible newborns, as well as parents' self-reported comprehension of research elements following these discussions. Gaps in both investigator disclosure and parental understanding were found. Nevertheless, parents reported comprehension of a greater number of research elements than were actually disclosed by investigators. Our preliminary results indicate the feasibility and potential utility of jointly examining parental understanding and investigator behavior to characterize consent for neonatal research. Directions for future research are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 83
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: further development and evaluation of the participatory and informed consent (PIC) measure
    Julia Wade
    Elka Humphrys
    Alba X Realpe
    Daisy M Gaunt
    Jenni Burt
    Trials, 24
  • [42] Systematic bias introduced by the informed consent process in a diagnostic research study
    Mitchell, Alice M.
    Kline, Jeffrey A.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (03) : 225 - 230
  • [43] Implementing a universal informed consent process for the All of Us Research Program
    Doerr, Megan
    Grayson, Shira
    Moore, Sarah
    Suver, Christine
    Wilbanks, John
    Wagner, Jennifer
    PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2019, 2019, : 427 - 438
  • [44] Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: further development and evaluation of the participatory and informed consent (PIC) measure
    Wade, Julia
    Humphrys, Elka
    Realpe, Alba X.
    Gaunt, Daisy M.
    Burt, Jenni
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [45] Measuring the Process and Quality of Informed Consent for Clinical Research: Development and Testing
    Cohn, Elizabeth Gross
    Jia, Haomiao
    Smith, Winifred Chapman
    Erwin, Katherine
    Larson, Elaine L.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2011, 38 (04) : 417 - 422
  • [47] Assessing the impact of a modified informed consent process in a South African HIV/AIDS research trial
    Penn, Claire
    Evans, Melanie
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 80 (02) : 191 - 199
  • [48] Intensive Care Patients' Evaluations of the Informed Consent Process
    Clark, Paul Alexander
    DIMENSIONS OF CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2007, 26 (05) : 207 - 226
  • [49] Accountability, trust and informed consent in medical practice and research
    O'Neill, O
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2004, 4 (03) : 269 - 276
  • [50] Informed Consent for Bedside Procedures in Pediatric and Neonatal ICUs: A Nationwide Survey
    Arnolds, Marin M.
    Feltman, Dalia M.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (06) : E251 - E257