EVALUATION OF THE CONTENT AND PROCESS OF INFORMED CONSENT DISCUSSIONS FOR NEONATAL RESEARCH

被引:4
|
作者
Marc-Aurele, Krishelle L. [1 ]
Steinman, Sara L.
Ransom, Kelly M. [2 ]
Finer, Neil N.
Dunn, Laura B. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Neonatol, Dept Pediat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Fielding Grad Univ, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
neonatology; informed consent; medical ethics; research subjects; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; LEUKEMIA TRIALS; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.78
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
STUDIES OF INFORMED CONSENT FOR neonatal research suggest that there are gaps in parental understanding of key aspects of research. Few studies have examined parental understanding and investigator disclosure simultaneously. This pilot study evaluated the content and processes of 21 audio-recorded consent discussions with parents of eligible newborns, as well as parents' self-reported comprehension of research elements following these discussions. Gaps in both investigator disclosure and parental understanding were found. Nevertheless, parents reported comprehension of a greater number of research elements than were actually disclosed by investigators. Our preliminary results indicate the feasibility and potential utility of jointly examining parental understanding and investigator behavior to characterize consent for neonatal research. Directions for future research are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 83
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genetic research, adolescents, and informed consent
    Weir, RF
    Horton, JR
    THEORETICAL MEDICINE, 1995, 16 (04): : 347 - 373
  • [22] Erosion of informed consent in US research
    Shepherd, Lois
    Macklin, Ruth
    BIOETHICS, 2019, 33 (01) : 4 - 12
  • [23] Audit of the Informed Consent Process as a Part of a Clinical Research Quality Assurance Program
    Pramod M. Lad
    Rebecca Dahl
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2014, 20 : 469 - 479
  • [24] Are subjects satisfied with the informed consent process? A survey of research participants
    Pope, JE
    Tingey, DP
    Arnold, JMO
    Hong, P
    Ouimet, JM
    Krizova, A
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 30 (04) : 815 - 824
  • [25] The decision dynamics of clinical research - The context and process of informed consent
    Kuczewski, MG
    Marshall, P
    MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (09) : 45 - 54
  • [26] Informed consent and the research process: Following rules or striking balances?
    Wiles, Rose
    Crow, Graham
    Charles, Vikki
    Heath, Sue
    SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE, 2007, 12 (02):
  • [27] The informed consent process: An evaluation of the challenges and adherence of Ghanaian researchers
    Blankson, Paa-Kwesi
    Akumiah, Florence
    Laar, Amos
    Kearns, Lisa
    Owusu, Samuel Asiedu
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2025, 25 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [28] Informed consent and aphasia: Evidence of pitfalls in the process
    Penn, Claire
    Frankel, Tali
    Watermeyer, Jennifer
    Mueller, Madeleine
    APHASIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) : 3 - 32
  • [29] Enhancing the informed consent process for critical care research: Strategies from a thromboprophylaxis trial
    Smith, Orla M.
    McDonald, Ellen
    Zytaruk, Nicole
    Foster, Denise
    Matte, Andrea
    Clarke, France
    Fleury, Suzie
    Krause, Katie
    McArdle, Tracey
    Skrobik, Yoanna
    Cook, Deborah J.
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2013, 29 (06) : 300 - 309
  • [30] Informed consent: Process or outcome?
    Milton, CL
    NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 13 (04) : 291 - 292