EVALUATION OF THE CONTENT AND PROCESS OF INFORMED CONSENT DISCUSSIONS FOR NEONATAL RESEARCH

被引:4
|
作者
Marc-Aurele, Krishelle L. [1 ]
Steinman, Sara L.
Ransom, Kelly M. [2 ]
Finer, Neil N.
Dunn, Laura B. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Neonatol, Dept Pediat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Fielding Grad Univ, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
neonatology; informed consent; medical ethics; research subjects; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; LEUKEMIA TRIALS; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.78
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
STUDIES OF INFORMED CONSENT FOR neonatal research suggest that there are gaps in parental understanding of key aspects of research. Few studies have examined parental understanding and investigator disclosure simultaneously. This pilot study evaluated the content and processes of 21 audio-recorded consent discussions with parents of eligible newborns, as well as parents' self-reported comprehension of research elements following these discussions. Gaps in both investigator disclosure and parental understanding were found. Nevertheless, parents reported comprehension of a greater number of research elements than were actually disclosed by investigators. Our preliminary results indicate the feasibility and potential utility of jointly examining parental understanding and investigator behavior to characterize consent for neonatal research. Directions for future research are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 83
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff
    O' Sullivan, Lydia
    Feeney, Laura
    Crowley, Rachel K.
    Sukumar, Prasanth
    McAuliffe, Eilish
    Doran, Peter
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [2] An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff
    Lydia O’ Sullivan
    Laura Feeney
    Rachel K. Crowley
    Prasanth Sukumar
    Eilish McAuliffe
    Peter Doran
    Trials, 22
  • [3] Family perceptions of clinical research and the informed consent process in the ICU
    Labruyere, Marie
    Meunier-Beillard, Nicolas
    Ecarnot, Fiona
    Large, Audrey
    Aptel, Francois
    Roudaut, Jean-Baptiste
    Andreu, Pascal
    Dargent, Auguste
    Rigaud, Jean-Philippe
    Quenot, Jean-Pierre
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 68 : 141 - 143
  • [4] Agency and Communication Challenges in Discussions of Informed Consent in Pediatric Cancer Research
    Young, Amanda J.
    Kim, Loel
    Li, Shu
    Baker, Justin N.
    Schmidt, Michael
    Camp, Jonathan W.
    Barfield, Raymond C.
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2010, 20 (05) : 628 - 643
  • [5] Keys to improving the informed consent process in research: Highlights of the i-CONSENT project
    Fons-Martinez, Jaime
    Ferrer-Albero, Cristina
    Diez-Domingo, Javier
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (04) : 1183 - 1185
  • [6] Informed consent content in research with survivors of psychological trauma
    Abu-Rus, Ana
    Bussell, Noah
    Olsen, Donald C.
    Ardill, Marie
    Davis-Ku, Alissa L.
    Arzoumanian, Meline A.
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 29 (08) : 595 - 606
  • [7] Optimizing Informed Consent Discussions: Developing a Narrative for Transfusion Consent
    Zeller, Michelle P.
    Laureano, Marissa
    Khandelwal, Aditi
    Lane, Shannon J.
    Haspel, Richard
    Fung, Mark
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2023, 37 (03)
  • [8] Informed consent in clinical research
    Slavicek, G.
    Forsdahl, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY & OCCLUSION MEDICINE, 2009, 2 (03) : 141 - 146
  • [9] Schizophrenia and informed consent to research
    Fovet, T.
    Amad, A.
    Thomas, P.
    Jardri, R.
    ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2015, 41 (05): : 394 - 402
  • [10] Proxies and consent discussions for dementia research
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    Roter, Debra
    Cain, Carole
    Wallace, Roberta
    Schmechel, Don
    Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2007, 55 (04) : 556 - 561