Mercury emissions of a coal-fired power plant in Germany

被引:12
|
作者
Weigelt, Andreas [1 ,6 ]
Slemr, Franz [2 ]
Ebinghaus, Ralf [1 ]
Pirrone, Nicola [3 ]
Bieser, Johannes [1 ,4 ]
Boedewadt, Jan [1 ]
Esposito, Giulio [3 ]
van Velthoven, Peter F. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] HZG, Inst Coastal Res, Geesthacht, Germany
[2] MPI C, Dept Atmospher Chem, Mainz, Germany
[3] CNR, Inst Atmospher Pollut Res, Arcavacata Di Rende, Italy
[4] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt DLR, Inst Atmospher Phys, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
[5] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst KNMI, Chem & Climate Div, De Bilt, Netherlands
[6] Fed Maritime & Hydrog Agcy BSH, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
FLUE-GAS DESULFURIZATION; ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY; OXIDIZED MERCURY; UPPER TROPOSPHERE; GASEOUS MERCURY; MODELING MERCURY; SPECIATION; METHYLMERCURY; COMBUSTION; DENUDERS;
D O I
10.5194/acp-16-13653-2016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hg / SO2, Hg / CO, NOx / SO2 (NOx being the sum of NO and NO2) emission ratios (ERs) in the plume of the coal-fired power plant (CFPP), Lippendorf, near Leipzig, Germany, were determined within the European Tropospheric Mercury Experiment (ETMEP) aircraft campaign in August 2013. The gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) fraction of mercury emissions was also assessed. Measured Hg / SO2 and Hg / CO ERs were within the measurement uncertainties consistent with the ratios calculated from annual emissions in 2013 reported by the CFPP operator, while the NOx / SO2 ER was somewhat lower. The GOM fraction of total mercury emissions, estimated using three independent methods, was below similar to 25 %. This result is consistent with other findings and suggests that GOM fractions of similar to 40% of CFPP mercury emissions in current emission inventories are overestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:13653 / 13668
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of flue gas purification facilities of coal-fired power plant on mercury emission
    Li Bing
    Wang Hongliang
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 190 - 196
  • [32] Mercury Species in Seawater and Sediment of Xiamen Western Sea Area Adjacent to a Coal-fired Power Plant
    Liang, Ying
    Liu, Xiyao
    Yuan, Dongxing
    Gong, Zhebin
    Zhang, Zhen
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2010, 82 (04) : 335 - 341
  • [33] Causal analysis of nitrogen oxides emissions process in coal-fired power plant with LiNGAM
    Saito, Tatsuki
    Fujiwara, Koichi
    FRONTIERS IN ANALYTICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 3
  • [34] Impact of a Coal-Fired Power Plant Shutdown Campaign on Heavy Metal Emissions in China
    Zhou, Sili
    Wei, Wendong
    Chen, Long
    Zhang, Zengkai
    Liu, Zhaohui
    Wang, Yi
    Kong, Jiayue
    Li, Jiashuo
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (23) : 14063 - 14069
  • [35] Models for Coal Blending with Inventory in Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Zhao Jian
    Liu Shi-xin
    2013 25TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2013, : 1790 - 1793
  • [36] Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 1. Mercury
    Zhao, Shilin
    Duan, Yufeng
    Chen, Lei
    Li, Yaning
    Yao, Ting
    Liu, Shuai
    Liu, Meng
    Lu, Jianhong
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 229 : 863 - 870
  • [37] Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China
    Wang, S. X.
    Zhang, L.
    Li, G. H.
    Wu, Y.
    Hao, J. M.
    Pirrone, N.
    Sprovieri, F.
    Ancora, M. P.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (03) : 1183 - 1192
  • [38] Speciation of Mercury in Coal-Fired Power Station Flue Gas
    Shah, Pushan
    Strezov, Vladimir
    Nelson, Peter F.
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2010, 24 (01) : 205 - 212
  • [39] Mercury concentrations in wetlands associated with coal-fired power plants
    Weir, Scott M.
    Halbrook, Richard S.
    Sparling, Donald W.
    ECOTOXICOLOGY, 2010, 19 (02) : 306 - 316
  • [40] Mercury Migration Behavior from Flue Gas to Fly Ashes in a Commercial Coal-Fired CFB Power Plant
    Li, Xiaohang
    Teng, Yang
    Zhang, Kai
    Peng, Hao
    Cheng, Fangqin
    Yoshikawa, Kunio
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (05)