Determinants of Support for Climate Change Efforts in the Global South

被引:2
|
作者
Adugu, Emmanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Indies, Dept Govt Sociol Social Work & Psychol, Cave Hill Campus, Bridgetown, Barbados
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | 2020年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
climate change; environmental concern; greenhouse emissions; ecological crisis; Africa;
D O I
10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n1p455
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper addresses determinants that underpin support for climate change efforts. The study is based on Pew Research Center (USA), Spring 2015 Global Attitudes survey dataset, with a primary focus on climate change, collected from March 25 to May 27, 2015. Drawing on the new ecological paradigm and ecological modernization perspectives, the paper utilizing logistic regression, examines the relationship between individuals' perception or awareness of the severity of climate change and their support for limiting greenhouse emissions; the extent to which individuals' views on whether developing countries should do as much as the rich countries in addressing climate change predict the likelihood of their (individuals') support for limiting greenhouse emissions. The logistic regression models reveal that people's rational insight into the following consequences of climate change positively predicts support for limiting greenhouse emissions: severe weather like floods or severe storms; long periods of unusually hot weather; rising sea levels; years of schooling and age positively predict support for limiting greenhouse emissions. In general, knowing an individual's country of residence offers no predictive value in determining whether the individual will support limiting greenhouse emissions. The notable exceptions are: South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana and Kenya. These four countries display positive and statistically significant coefficients in the logistic regression model predicting support for greenhouse emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 468
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies in South India: Empirical evidence
    Kumar, K. N. Ravi
    Reddy, M. J. Mohan
    Reddy, K. Viswanatha
    Paramesha, Venkatesh
    Balasubramanian, M.
    Kumar, T. Kiran
    Kumar, R. Mohan
    Reddy, D. Damodar
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [2] Climate change, equity and the relevance of European 'effort-sharing' for global mitigation efforts
    Stephenson, Paule
    Boston, Jonathan
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2010, 10 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [3] Determinants of melon farmers' adaptation strategies to climate change hazards in south-south Nigeria
    Aroyehun, Adeyinka Richard
    Ugwuja, Vivian Chinelo
    Onoja, Anthony Ojonimi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [4] Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers' willingness to act and to support policy measures
    Tobler, Christina
    Visschers, Vivianne H. M.
    Siegrist, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 32 (03) : 197 - 207
  • [5] REGIONAL CLIMATE VARIATIONS IN SOUTH CHINA RELATED TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE AND LOCAL URBANIZATION
    Li, Qinglan
    Chen, Ji
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 60 - 65
  • [6] Climate change effects on vulnerable populations in the Global South: a systematic review
    Bethuel Sibongiseni Ngcamu
    Natural Hazards, 2023, 118 : 977 - 991
  • [7] Cities as transnational climate change actors: applying a Global South perspective
    Koch, Florian
    THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2021, 42 (09) : 2055 - 2073
  • [8] The Equity Dimension of Climate Change: Perspectives From the Global North and South
    Seasons, Mark
    URBAN PLANNING, 2021, 6 (04): : 283 - 286
  • [9] Climate change effects on vulnerable populations in the Global South: a systematic review
    Ngcamu, Bethuel Sibongiseni
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2023, 118 (02) : 977 - 991
  • [10] Climate change adaptation planning for Global South megacities: the case of Dhaka
    Araos, Malcolm
    Ford, James
    Berrang-Ford, Lea
    Biesbroek, Robbert
    Moser, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2017, 19 (06) : 682 - 696