Completeness of intervention reporting in neurology randomized controlled trials: a retrospective, cross-sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Roberts, William [1 ]
Beavers, Craig [1 ]
Jellison, Samuel [1 ]
Vassar, Matt [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Inst Res, 1111 West 17th St, Tulsa, OK 74107 USA
关键词
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; evidence-based healthcare; intervention reporting; neurology; randomized controlled trial; Template for Intervention Description and Replication; GUIDELINES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1097/XEB.0000000000000224
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Incomplete reporting of interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may hinder the replicability of studies and thus lead to adverse clinical outcomes for patients. Currently, little is known about the completeness of intervention reporting in neurology clinical trials. This study's primary objective was to determine the completeness of intervention reporting in neurology RCTs, as measured by the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. The secondary objectives of this study were to compare the completeness of intervention reporting before and after TIDieR publication and to evaluate factors associated with intervention reporting. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, pilot-tested, double-blind investigation of 141 neurology RCTs to determine the completeness of intervention reporting in neurology. Results: Overall, the average number of TIDieR checklist items that reached completion per study was 7.4 out of 12 (61.7%). We found no increase in intervention reporting following the publication of TIDieR (P = 0.35). Our generalized estimating equation analysis found that poorer TIDieR adherence was associated with trials lacking a trial registration (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Our findings showed that on average, authors reported only 61.7% of items on the TIDieR checklist. These findings have significant implications, because incomplete reporting may hinder the replicability of studies and thus negatively affect clinical outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 221
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized controlled trials in pediatric patients had higher completion rates than adult trials: a cross-sectional study
    Dufetelle, Edouard
    't Jong, Geert W.
    Kaguelidou, Florentia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 100 : 53 - 60
  • [42] Exclusion of older persons from randomized controlled trials in type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study
    Borysowski, Jan
    Klosowska, Danuta
    Paczek, Leszek
    Ordak, Michal
    Franek, Edward
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2025, 27 (03): : 1379 - 1387
  • [43] Transparency in surgical randomized clinical trials: cross-sectional observational study
    Helliwell, J. A.
    Shelton, B.
    Mahmood, H.
    Blanco-Colino, R.
    Fitzgerald, J. E.
    Harrison, E. M.
    Bhangu, A.
    Chapman, S. J.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (05): : 977 - 984
  • [44] Underreporting of Secondary Endpoints in Randomized Trials Cross-sectional, Observational Study
    Matthews, Jacob H.
    Bhanderi, Shivam
    Chapman, Stephen J.
    Nepogodiev, Dmitri
    Pinkney, Thomas
    Bhangu, Aneel
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 264 (06) : 982 - 986
  • [45] Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review
    Hopewell, Sally
    Collins, Gary S.
    Hirst, Allison
    Kirtley, Shona
    Tajar, Abdelouahid
    Gerry, Stephen
    Altman, Douglas G.
    TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [46] Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review
    Sally Hopewell
    Gary S Collins
    Allison Hirst
    Shona Kirtley
    Abdelouahid Tajar
    Stephen Gerry
    Douglas G Altman
    Trials, 14
  • [47] Reporting quality of conference abstracts on randomised controlled trials in gerontology and geriatrics: a cross-sectional investigation
    Mann, Eva
    Meyer, Gabriele
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2011, 105 (06): : 459 - 462
  • [48] TRANSPARENCY IN SURGICAL RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS: CROSS-SECTIONAL, OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    Helliwell, J. A.
    Shelton, B.
    Mahmood, H.
    Blanco-Colino, R.
    Fitzgerald, J. E.
    Harrison, E. M.
    Bhangu, A.
    Chapman, S. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [49] Transparency in Surgical Randomised Controlled Trials: Cross-Sectional, Observational Study
    Helliwell, J.
    Shelton, B.
    Mahmood, H.
    Blanco-Colino, R.
    Fitzgerald, J. E.
    Harrison, E.
    Bhangu, A.
    Chapman, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 17 - 18
  • [50] Research Waste in Surgical Randomised Controlled Trials: Cross-sectional Study
    Aldaffaa, M.
    Downey, C.
    Chapman, S.
    Jayne, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 10 - 10