Completeness of intervention reporting in neurology randomized controlled trials: a retrospective, cross-sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Roberts, William [1 ]
Beavers, Craig [1 ]
Jellison, Samuel [1 ]
Vassar, Matt [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Inst Res, 1111 West 17th St, Tulsa, OK 74107 USA
关键词
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; evidence-based healthcare; intervention reporting; neurology; randomized controlled trial; Template for Intervention Description and Replication; GUIDELINES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1097/XEB.0000000000000224
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Incomplete reporting of interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may hinder the replicability of studies and thus lead to adverse clinical outcomes for patients. Currently, little is known about the completeness of intervention reporting in neurology clinical trials. This study's primary objective was to determine the completeness of intervention reporting in neurology RCTs, as measured by the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. The secondary objectives of this study were to compare the completeness of intervention reporting before and after TIDieR publication and to evaluate factors associated with intervention reporting. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, pilot-tested, double-blind investigation of 141 neurology RCTs to determine the completeness of intervention reporting in neurology. Results: Overall, the average number of TIDieR checklist items that reached completion per study was 7.4 out of 12 (61.7%). We found no increase in intervention reporting following the publication of TIDieR (P = 0.35). Our generalized estimating equation analysis found that poorer TIDieR adherence was associated with trials lacking a trial registration (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Our findings showed that on average, authors reported only 61.7% of items on the TIDieR checklist. These findings have significant implications, because incomplete reporting may hinder the replicability of studies and thus negatively affect clinical outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 221
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How prevalent are financial conflicts of interest in dermatology randomized controlled trials? A cross-sectional study
    Steele, L.
    Earp, E.
    Hong, A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 46 (04) : 715 - 719
  • [32] What do letters to the editor publish about randomized controlled trials? A cross-sectional study
    Kastner M.
    Menon A.
    Straus S.E.
    Laupacis A.
    BMC Research Notes, 6 (1)
  • [33] REPORTING QUALITY OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF PERIODONTAL DISEASES IN JOURNAL ABSTRACTS-A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY AND BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
    Kumar, Satish
    Mohammad, Husain
    Vora, Hita
    Kar, Kian
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (02) : 130 - +
  • [34] Evaluation of the completeness of intervention reporting in Cochrane surgical systematic reviews using the TIDieR-SR checklist: a cross-sectional study
    Vassar, Matt
    Page, Matthew J.
    Glasbey, James
    Cooper, Craig
    Jorski, Austin
    Sosio, Jessica
    Wayant, Cole
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2021, 26 (02) : 51 - +
  • [35] Reporting Compliance of Stroke Trials: Cross-Sectional Analysis
    Malhotra, Konark
    Rayi, Appaji
    Khunger, Monica
    Thompson, Stephanie
    Liebeskind, David S.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 26 (07): : 1472 - 1480
  • [36] Reporting characteristics and quality of randomized controlled trial protocols in traditional Chinese medicine: a cross-sectional study
    Zhang, Lin
    Li, Han
    Hu, Lihan
    Ou, Xiangqin
    Tan, Hanzhi
    Zhang, Xuanqi
    Lau, Chung Tai
    Lyu, Aiping
    Bian, Zhaoxiang
    Zhang, Xuan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [37] The methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional systemic review
    Yu, Jiajie
    Yang, Zhengyue
    Zhang, You
    Cui, Yufan
    Tang, Jinlian
    Hirst, Allison
    Li, Youping
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (10) : 1817 - 1822
  • [38] Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials A Cross-sectional Survey
    Yu, Jiajie
    Chen, Wenwen
    Chen, Shidong
    Jia, Pengli
    Su, Guanyue
    Li, Youping
    Sun, Xin
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (06) : 1065 - 1069
  • [39] Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Operative Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Analysis
    Fang, X.
    Wu, X.
    Levey, C.
    Chen, Z.
    Hua, F.
    Zhang, L.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 47 (03) : 287 - 300
  • [40] A cross-sectional study assessing visual abstracts of randomized trials revealed inadequate reporting and high prevalence of spin
    Duran, Melissa
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Hopewell, Sally
    Bonnet, Hillary
    Sidorkiewicz, Stephanie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 176