Completeness of intervention reporting in neurology randomized controlled trials: a retrospective, cross-sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Roberts, William [1 ]
Beavers, Craig [1 ]
Jellison, Samuel [1 ]
Vassar, Matt [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Inst Res, 1111 West 17th St, Tulsa, OK 74107 USA
关键词
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; evidence-based healthcare; intervention reporting; neurology; randomized controlled trial; Template for Intervention Description and Replication; GUIDELINES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1097/XEB.0000000000000224
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Incomplete reporting of interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may hinder the replicability of studies and thus lead to adverse clinical outcomes for patients. Currently, little is known about the completeness of intervention reporting in neurology clinical trials. This study's primary objective was to determine the completeness of intervention reporting in neurology RCTs, as measured by the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. The secondary objectives of this study were to compare the completeness of intervention reporting before and after TIDieR publication and to evaluate factors associated with intervention reporting. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, pilot-tested, double-blind investigation of 141 neurology RCTs to determine the completeness of intervention reporting in neurology. Results: Overall, the average number of TIDieR checklist items that reached completion per study was 7.4 out of 12 (61.7%). We found no increase in intervention reporting following the publication of TIDieR (P = 0.35). Our generalized estimating equation analysis found that poorer TIDieR adherence was associated with trials lacking a trial registration (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Our findings showed that on average, authors reported only 61.7% of items on the TIDieR checklist. These findings have significant implications, because incomplete reporting may hinder the replicability of studies and thus negatively affect clinical outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 221
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study
    Martinic-Cezar, Iva Jercic
    Marusic, Ana
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [2] Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study
    Iva Jerčić Martinić-Cezar
    Ana Marušić
    Trials, 20
  • [3] Reporting of sex and gender in randomized controlled trials in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study
    V. Welch
    M. Doull
    M. Yoganathan
    J. Jull
    M. Boscoe
    S. E. Coen
    Z. Marshall
    J. Pardo Pardo
    A. Pederson
    J. Petkovic
    L. Puil
    L. Quinlan
    B. Shea
    T. Rader
    V. Runnels
    S. Tudiver
    Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2 (1)
  • [4] Evaluating Reporting Completeness of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Esophageal Motility Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Staggs, Jordan
    Williams, Cole
    Love, Mitchell
    Renner, Abbey
    Kee, Micah
    Hillman, Cody
    Shepard, Samuel
    Heigle, Benjamin
    Rauh, Shelby
    Ottwell, Ryan
    Hartwell, Micah
    Vassar, Matt
    DYSPHAGIA, 2022, 37 (06) : 1576 - 1585
  • [5] Evaluating Reporting Completeness of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Esophageal Motility Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jordan Staggs
    Cole Williams
    Mitchell Love
    Abbey Renner
    Micah Kee
    Cody Hillman
    Samuel Shepard
    Benjamin Heigle
    Shelby Rauh
    Ryan Ottwell
    Micah Hartwell
    Matt Vassar
    Dysphagia, 2022, 37 : 1576 - 1585
  • [6] Reporting sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials published in nursing journals: A cross-sectional study
    Tam, Wilson
    Lo, Kenneth
    Woo, Brigitte
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 102
  • [7] The quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional survey
    Jia, Pengli
    Tang, Li
    Yu, Jiajie
    Liu, Jiali
    Kang, Deying
    Sun, Xin
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [8] Poor reporting quality of randomized controlled trials comparing treatments of COVID-19-A retrospective cross-sectional study on the first year of publications
    Gruesser, Linda
    Eissing, Charlotte
    Kowark, Ana
    Keszei, Andras P.
    Wallqvist, Julia
    Rossaint, Rolf
    Ziemann, Sebastian
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (10):
  • [9] A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Spin in Randomized Controlled Trials
    Woodbridge, Alexandra
    Abraham, Ann
    Ahn, Rosa
    Saba, Susan
    Korenstein, Deborah
    Madden, Erin
    Keyhani, Salomeh
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (03) : 247 - 248
  • [10] A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Spin in Randomized Controlled Trials
    Alexandra Woodbridge
    Ann Abraham
    Rosa Ahn
    Susan Saba
    Deborah Korenstein
    Erin Madden
    Salomeh Keyhani
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 247 - 248