The cultural dimensions of Pakistani teachers' zone of acceptance regarding school principals' authority

被引:0
作者
Deniz, Unal [1 ]
Demirkasimoglu, Nihan [2 ]
机构
[1] Turkish Maarif Fdn, Dept Supervis & Guidance, TR-34662 Uskudar Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Educ Sci, Beytepe, Turkey
关键词
Authority of the school principal; cultural dimensions; zone of acceptance; professional zone of acceptance; PERFORMANCE INFORMATION; LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/13603124.2022.2076288
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The focus of this case study is to examine the antecedents and consequences of teachers' zone of acceptance regarding the authority of school principals within the framework of three cultural dimensions (individualism, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance). Participants were 20 teachers who work in two different schools in Lahore, Pakistan, and were formed by the maximum variation sampling method. The data of the study were obtained with a semi-structured interview form developed by the researchers and analyzed with descriptive and content analysis techniques. The results of the research showed that participants saw the school principal as a strong authority in line with the cultural dimensions of individualism, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance. Accordingly, the participants developed a broad zone of acceptance regarding the authority of the school principal. In addition, it has been revealed that the type of the decision and the way the decision is taken are important factors in shaping the zone of acceptance. Accordingly, while teachers have a broad zone of acceptance in administrative decisions, they have a narrower zone of acceptance in professional decisions. Therefore, professional decisions are the area where there is the most challenged in terms of the school principal's exercise of power.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Adsit D.J., 1997, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, V8, P385, DOI DOI 10.1080/095851997341513
[2]  
Ahmad M., 2016, Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), V36, P907
[3]  
Balci E., 2017, J INT SOCIAL RES, V10, P517
[4]  
Barnard C. I., 1968, FUNCT EXECUTIVE
[5]  
Bass B.M., 2008, The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerialapplications, V4th
[6]  
Blau P., 1962, FORMAL ORG COMP APPR
[7]  
Bridges E.M., 1967, Journal of Educational Administration, V5, P136
[8]   MODEL FOR SHARED DECISION MAKING IN SCHOOL PRINCIPALSHIP [J].
BRIDGES, EM .
EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 1967, 3 (01) :49-61
[9]  
Catlin M.W., 1982, THESIS U ALABAMA
[10]   LEGITIMACY OF ADMINISTRATIVE INFLUENCE AS PERCEIVED BY SELECTED GROUPS [J].
CLEAR, DK ;
SEAGER, RC .
EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 1971, 7 (01) :46-63