Integrating livestock production with crops and saline fish ponds to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

被引:6
|
作者
Ogburn, Damian M. [1 ]
White, Ian [2 ]
机构
[1] Wave Solut, Subiaco, WA 6904, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
fish farm; integrated farming; climate change mitigation; cyanobacteria mats; acid sulphate soil; CARBON-DIOXIDE; METHANE; CYCLE;
D O I
10.1080/1943815X.2010.542755
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Extensive grazing systems in the tropics have large greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here an integrated cropping, livestock farming and saline pond aquaculture system is described which also reduces GHG emissions in tropical farming. The system was developed in the 1980s in the central Philippines and is re-evaluated in terms of its potential to reduce emissions from livestock production, particularly in wet and wet-dry tropical regions. The estimated cumulative annual GHG emission savings amount to 12.9 tonne CO2-e per head of cattle exiting the integrated feedlot system after 300 days. Use of silage from crop by-products and implementation of a feed-lot programme enabled immediate and significant reductions of GHG emissions over extensive cattle grazing. Integration with a saline animal waste processing pond allowed production of natural feed products, cyanobacteria algal mat for use in aquaculture, as crop fertiliser and soil amendment or in the silage manufacture process. Fish production from ponds receiving the harvested algal mat resulted in an annual average of 3300 kg/ha compared to an average 700 kg/ha in inorganic fertilised ponds. The unitised ratios for the integrated system were respectively: 1 ha sugarcane: 4 head of cattle: 0.13 ha saline waste processing pond. Stoichiometrically, bio-processing of waste material in saline ponds provides a novel solution to GHG emissions from feedlots. It uses a multi-step process dominated by cyanobacteria mats in which all the captured liquid and solid waste is passed through fermentation and a mixed aerobic and anaerobic photosynthesis/photosynthesis and mixed aerobic/anaerobic sulphate reduction pathway to use organic wastes and also reduce GHG emissions. Sulphate is reduced and sequestered as iron sulphide eliminating the potential for harmful sulphide emissions. Calcium carbonate precipitation in the cyanobacteria mats results in significant sequestration of carbon. The process produces organic feed matter with a three-fold increase in nitrogen levels arising from nitrogen fixation in the treatment pond.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 52
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Crop Production
    A. S. Strokov
    Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2021, 91 : 197 - 203
  • [42] Can UK livestock production be configured to maintain production while meeting targets to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and ammonia?
    Webb, J.
    Audsley, Eric
    Williams, Adrian
    Pearn, Kerry
    Chatterton, Julia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 83 : 204 - 211
  • [43] The impact of controlling diseases of significant global importance on greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production
    Judith L. Capper
    One Health Outlook, 5
  • [44] A review of mitigation technologies and management strategies for greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions in livestock production
    Yan, Xiaojie
    Ying, Yongfei
    Li, Kunkun
    Zhang, Qiang
    Wang, Kaiying
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 352
  • [45] Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems
    Herrero, Mario
    Havlik, Petr
    Valin, Hugo
    Notenbaert, An
    Rufino, Mariana C.
    Thornton, Philip K.
    Bluemmel, Michael
    Weiss, Franz
    Grace, Delia
    Obersteiner, Michael
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (52) : 20888 - 20893
  • [46] The concordance between greenhouse gas emissions, livestock production and profitability of extensive beef farming systems
    Harrison, Matthew T.
    Cullen, Brendan R.
    Tomkins, Nigel W.
    McSweeney, Chris
    Cohn, Philip
    Eckard, Richard J.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (2-3) : 370 - 384
  • [47] What is the potential for reducing national greenhouse gas emissions from crop and livestock production systems?
    Audsley, Eric
    Wilkinson, Mike
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 73 : 263 - 268
  • [48] The impact of controlling diseases of significant global importance on greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production
    Capper, Judith L.
    ONE HEALTH OUTLOOK, 2023, 5 (01):
  • [49] Better assessments of greenhouse gas emissions from global fish ponds needed to adequately evaluate aquaculture footprint
    Kosten, Sarian
    Almeida, Rafael M.
    Barbosa, Icaro
    Mendonca, Raquel
    Muzitano, Ive Santos
    Oliveira-Junior, Ernandes Sobreira
    Vroom, Renske J. E.
    Wang, Hai-Jun
    Barros, Nathan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 748
  • [50] Greenhouse gas emissions and biogas potential from livestock in Ecuador
    Cornejo, Camilo
    Wilkie, Ann C.
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 14 (04) : 256 - 266