Effects of a moving distractor object on time-to-contact judgments

被引:35
|
作者
Oberfeld, Daniel [1 ]
Hecht, Heiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Psychol, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
关键词
time to arrival; task-irrelevant object; TTC theory; contrast effect; visual motion;
D O I
10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.605
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The effects of moving task-irrelevant objects on time-to-contact (TTC) judgments were examined in 5 experiments. Observers viewed a directly approaching target in the presence of a distractor object moving in parallel with the target. In Experiments 1 to 4, observers decided whether the target would have collided with them earlier or later than a standard (absolute identification task). A contrast effect was observed: If the distractor arrived later than the target, it caused a bias toward early responses, relative to the condition without a distractor. The early-arriving distractor had no significant effect. The pattern of results was unaltered when potentially confounding information from individual visual cues was removed. The availability of stereoscopic information reduced the effect. The contrast effect was also observed if target and distractor were abstract geometric objects rather than simulations of real-world vehicles, rendering less likely a simple safety strategy activated by a potentially threatening distractor. Experiment 5 showed that the effect of the late-arriving distractor generalized to a prediction-motion task. The results indicate that task-irrelevant information in the background has to be considered in revision of time-to-contact theory.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 623
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Time-to-Contact from Image Intensity
    Watanabe, Yukitoshi
    Sakaue, Fumihiko
    Sato, Jun
    2015 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2015, : 4176 - 4183
  • [32] A smart mechanism for time-to-contact detection
    Kappe, B.
    PERCEPTION, 1996, 25 : 127 - 127
  • [33] Is judging time-to-contact based on 'tau'?
    Smeets, JBJ
    Brenner, E
    Trebuchet, S
    Mestre, DR
    PERCEPTION, 1996, 25 (05) : 583 - 590
  • [34] Time-to-contact from photometric information
    Watanabe, Yukitoshi
    Sakaue, Fumihiko
    Sato, Jun
    IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications, 2014, 6 : 39 - 42
  • [35] Optical specification of time-to-contact for a spectator
    Kim, NG
    Effken, JA
    Carello, C
    ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 10 (02) : 128 - 156
  • [36] Asymmetrical time-to-contact error with two moving objects persists across different vertical separations
    Bennett, Simon J.
    Uji, Makoto
    Baures, Robin
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 185 : 146 - 154
  • [37] Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation
    Baures, Robin
    Maquestiaux, Francois
    DeLucia, Patricia R.
    Defer, Alexis
    Prigent, Elise
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 236 (07) : 1971 - 1984
  • [38] Time-to-contact: More than Tau alone
    Hancock, PA
    Manser, MP
    ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 9 (04) : 265 - 297
  • [39] Training in interception increases sensitivity to time-to-contact
    Karanka, J. T.
    Rushton, S. K.
    Freeman, T. C. A.
    PERCEPTION, 2007, 36 : 183 - 183
  • [40] Continuous Response Monitoring of Relative Time-to-Contact Judgments: Does Effective Information Change During an Approach Event?
    DeLucia, Patricia R.
    Meza-Arroyo, Manuel
    Baures, Robin
    Ranjit, Manish
    Hsiang, Simon
    Gorman, Jamie C.
    ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 28 (01) : 1 - 22