Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer caregivers (CNAT-C)

被引:12
作者
Zhang, Yin-Ping [1 ]
Zhao, Xin-Shuang [1 ]
Zhang, Bei [1 ]
Zhang, Lu-Lu [1 ]
Ni, Chun-Ping [2 ]
Hao, Nan [3 ]
Shi, Chang-Bei [4 ]
Porr, Caroline [5 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Nursing, Hlth Sci Ctr, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[2] Mental Hlth Inst, Ctr Clin, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oncol, Attached Hosp 1, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[4] Shaanxi Prov Tumor Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[5] Mem Univ, Sch Nursing, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Caregiver; Cancer; Needs assessment; Culturally appropriate survey instruments; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; VALIDATION; BURDEN; RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-014-0891-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer caregivers (CNAT-C) is a systematic and comprehensive needs assessment tool for the family caregivers. The purpose of this project was twofold: (1) to adapt the CNAT-C to Mainland China's cultural context and (2) to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese CNAT-C. Cross-cultural adaptation of the original CNAT-C was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 30 Chinese family cancer caregivers. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 205 Chinese cancer caregivers from Mainland China. Construct validity was determined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The split-half coefficient for the overall Chinese CNAT-C scale was 0.77. Principal component analysis resulted in an eight-factor structure explaining 68.11 % of the total variance. The comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.91 from the modified model confirmatory factor analysis. The Chi-square divided by degrees of freedom was 1.98, and the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.079. In relation to the known-group validation, significant differences were found in the Chinese CNAT-C scale according to various caregiver characteristics. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese CNAT-C reaching a Cronbach alpha value of 0.94. Test-retest reliability was 0.85. The newly adapted Chinese CNAT-C scale possesses adequate validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be used to ascertain holistic health and support needs of cancer patients' family caregivers in Mainland China.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1614
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] 李秋萍, 2012, [中华护理杂志, Chinese Journal of Nursing], V47, P1132
  • [2] American Cancer Society, 2013, CANC FACTS FIG 2013
  • [3] Batista-Foguet JM, 2004, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V122, P21
  • [4] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Guillemin, F
    Ferraz, MB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3186 - 3191
  • [5] Validation of the Spanish Translation of the Questionnaire for the Obesity-Related Problems Scale
    Bilbao, Amaia
    Mar, Javier
    Mar, Blanca
    Arrospide, Arantzazu
    Martinez de Aragon, Gabriel
    Maria Quintana, Jose
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2009, 19 (10) : 1393 - 1400
  • [6] Validation of the Arabic version of the Cohen perceived stress scale (PSS-10) among pregnant and postpartum women
    Chaaya, Monique
    Osman, Hibah
    Naassan, Georges
    Mahfoud, Ziyad
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 10
  • [7] Care for the caregivers: A review of self-report instruments developed to measure the burden, needs, and quality of life of informal caregivers
    Deeken, JF
    Taylor, KL
    Mangan, P
    Yabroff, KR
    Ingham, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 26 (04) : 922 - 953
  • [8] Structure of lifestyle disruptions in chronic disease - A confirmatory factor analysis of the illness intrusiveness ratings scale
    Devins, GM
    Dion, R
    Pelletier, LG
    Shapiro, CM
    Abbey, S
    Raiz, LR
    Binik, YM
    McGowan, P
    Kutner, NG
    Beanlands, H
    Edworthy, SM
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2001, 39 (10) : 1097 - 1104
  • [9] Dl Fairclough., 2002, DESIGN ANAL QUALITY
  • [10] Quality of Life assessment in clinical trials - Guidelines and a checklist for protocol writers: The UK Medical Research Council experience
    Fayers, PM
    Hopwood, P
    Harvey, A
    Girling, DJ
    Machin, D
    Stephens, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (01) : 20 - 28