Mutagenesis-based definitions and probes of residue burial in proteins

被引:48
|
作者
Bajaj, K
Chakrabarti, P
Varadarajan, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Mol Biophys Unit, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
[2] Jawaharlal Nehru Ctr Adv Sci Res, Chem Biol Unit, Bangalore 560004, Karnataka, India
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
accessibility; aspartate; scanning mutagenesis; phenotype;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0505089102
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Every residue of the 101-aa Escherichia, coli toxin CcdB was substituted with Ala, Asp, Glu, Lys, and Arg by using site-directed mutagenesis. The activity of each mutant in vivo was characterized as a function of Controller of Cell Division or Death B protein (CcdB) transcriptional level. The mutation data suggest that an accessibility value of 5% is an appropriate cutoff for definition of buried residues. At all buried positions, introduction of Asp results in an inactive phenotype at all CcdB transcriptional levels. The average amount of destabilization upon substitution at buried positions decreases in the order Asp>Glu>Lys>Arg>Ala. Asp substitutions at buried sites in two other proteins, maltose-binding protein and thioredoxin, also were shown to be severely destabilizing. Ala and Asp scanning mutagenesis, in combination with dose-dependent expression phenotypes, was shown to yield important information on protein structure and activity. These results also suggest that such scanning mutagenesis data can be used to rank order sequence alignments and their corresponding homology models, as well as to distinguish between correct and incorrect structural alignments. With continuous reductions in oligonucleotide costs and increasingly efficient site-directed mutagenesis procedures, comprehensive scanning mutagenesis experiments for small proteins/domains are quite feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:16221 / 16226
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of residue contacts in proteins with neural networks based on single sequence information
    Fariselli, P
    Casadio, R
    WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS: ISAS '98, 1998, : 527 - 533
  • [32] Interactive construction of residue-based diagrams of proteins: the RbDe web service
    Konvicka, K
    Campagne, F
    Weinstein, H
    PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 2000, 13 (06): : 395 - 396
  • [33] DeepBSRPred: deep learning-based binding site residue prediction for proteins
    Nikam, Rahul
    Yugandhar, Kumar
    Gromiha, M. Michael
    AMINO ACIDS, 2023, 55 (10) : 1305 - 1316
  • [34] Residue Adjacency Matrix Based Feature Engineering for Predicting Cysteine Reactivity in Proteins
    Mapes, Norman John, Jr.
    Rodriguez, Christopher
    Chowriappa, Pradeep
    Dua, Sumeet
    COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 17 : 90 - 100
  • [36] New affinity-based probes for capturing flavonoid-binding proteins
    Carrie, Helene
    Dong Tien Tran
    Rousseau, Sabrina
    Chaignepain, Stephane
    Schmitter, Jean-Marie
    Deffieux, Denis
    Quideau, Stephane
    CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 50 (66) : 9387 - 9389
  • [37] Covalent and selective immobilization of GST fusion proteins with fluorophosphonate-based probes
    Wang, Xiafeng
    Guo, Tianlin
    Chen, Jiahui
    Li, Xiaofeng
    Zhou, Yiqing
    Pan, Zhengying
    CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 54 (37) : 4661 - 4664
  • [38] A Structure-Based Computational Mutagenesis Elucidates the Spectrum of Stability-Activity Relationships in Proteins
    Masso, Majid
    Vaisman, Iosif I.
    2011 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2011, : 3225 - 3228
  • [39] Prediction of nucleic acid binding probability in proteins: a neighboring residue network based score
    Miao, Zhichao
    Westhof, Eric
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2015, 43 (11) : 5340 - 5351
  • [40] Synthesis and evaluation of locostatin-based chemical probes towards PEBP-proteins
    Hoogenboom, Jorin
    Fiers, Martijn
    Immink, Richard
    Zuilhof, Han
    Wennekes, Tom
    TETRAHEDRON LETTERS, 2016, 57 (22) : 2406 - 2409