FINANCIAL INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: LOAN PRICE IN THE CROWDFUNDING AND PEER-TO-PEER LENDING PLATFORMS

被引:5
|
作者
Keliuotyte-Staniuleniene, Greta [1 ]
Kukarenalte, Monika [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Univ, Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS | 2020年 / 02期
关键词
financial innovation; alternative financing; financial technologies; factors of interest rate; price of borrowing; the total annual rate of charge for business loans; CREDIT;
D O I
10.21272/mmi.2020.2-19
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
As an alternative to traditional bank financing, companies (especially small and medium-sized) can opt for loans from innovative financial facilities: peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding platforms. When using these alternative financing opportunities, it is very important to identify the main factors of the business loan interest rate and properly assess the overall cost of borrowing. This paper summarizes the scientific discussion on the issue of innovative business funding sources and one of the most important ratios referred to reasonably compare the price of financing sources and the related expenses. Therefore, the main purpose of this research is to identify the internal and external factors of interest rate on business loans and determine the overall total annual rate of charge for business loans on innovative financing platforms. After the analysis of academic literature and statistical data of crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending market, the authors used the methods of correlation-regression and factor analysis to identify the factors that determine the interest rate of business loans on crowdfunding and peer-to-peer platforms; and scenario analysis to evaluate the total annual rate of charge for business loans. According to the results of correlation-regression and factor analysis, the summarized factors of business loan interest rate are economic environment, competitive environment, and results of the platform performance. External factors appeared to have a much greater impact on the interest rate for business loans in crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending platforms than internal. The assessment of the total annual rate of charge for business loans confirmed that the peer-to-peer and crowdfunding platforms offer a lower rate than traditional financing institutions, on the other hand, the total rate at the crowdfunding platforms is higher compared to peer-to-peer lending platforms, due to the higher administrative fees and interest rates. The outcomes of this research expanded the scope of research on the sector of financial innovation. The research revealed the peculiarities of crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending, the factors that affect a loan interest rate, and the real price that business owners have to pay for borrowed funds. Obtained results could be relevant to both lending platforms and businesses seeking to identify and compare the real cost of traditional and alternative financing.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 274
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Peer-to-Peer Microlending Platforms: Characterization of Online Traits
    Paruthi, Gaurav
    Frias-Martinez, Enrique
    Frias-Martinez, Vanessa
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2016, : 2180 - 2189
  • [22] Description-text related soft information in peer-to-peer lending - Evidence from two leading European platforms
    Dorfleitner, Gregor
    Priberny, Christopher
    Schuster, Stephanie
    Stoiber, Johannes
    Weber, Martina
    de Castro, Ivan
    Kammler, Julia
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2016, 64 : 169 - 187
  • [23] Does university reputation matter? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending
    Li, Jianwen
    Hu, Jinyan
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 31 : 66 - 77
  • [24] Cultural diversity and borrowers' behavior: evidence from peer-to-peer lending
    Chen, Zhongfei
    Jin, Ming
    Andrikopoulos, Athanasios
    Li, Youwei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2022, 28 (17) : 1745 - 1769
  • [25] Do Unverifiable Disclosures Matter? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending
    Michels, Jeremy
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (04) : 1385 - 1413
  • [26] Politeness matters: The role of polite languages in online peer-to-peer lending
    Wang, Shaoda
    Ye, Dezhu
    Liao, Junyun
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 171
  • [27] Is there an effective reputation mechanism in peer-to-peer lending? Evidence from China
    Ding Jie
    Huang Jinbo
    Li Yong
    Meng Meichen
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 30 : 208 - 215
  • [28] Evaluating borrower's default risk in peer-to-peer lending: evidence from a lending platform in China
    Lin, Xuchen
    Li, Xiaolong
    Zheng, Zhong
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (35) : 3538 - 3545
  • [29] Voluntary disclosures and peer-to-peer lending decisions: Evidence from the repeated game
    Li, Yan
    Li, Cungang
    Gao, Yijun
    FRONTIERS OF BUSINESS RESEARCH IN CHINA, 2020, 14 (01)
  • [30] Mainstreaming social finance: The regulation of the peer-to-peer lending marketplace in the United Kingdom
    Rogers, Chris
    Clarke, Chris
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2016, 18 (04) : 930 - 945