Priming with threatening faces modulates the self-face advantage by enhancing the other-face processing rather than suppressing the self-face processing

被引:12
作者
Guan, Lili [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Mingming [1 ,2 ]
Li, Haijiang [1 ,2 ]
Hitchman, Glenn [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yijun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Fac Psychol, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Key Lab Cognit & Personal, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Self-face advantage; Emotional face prime; Event-related potentials (ERP); P3; GENERALIZED SOCIAL PHOBIA; SUBJECTS OWN NAME; BRAIN POTENTIALS; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; ERP EVIDENCE; NEURAL BASIS; RECOGNITION; P300; ATTENTION; STIMULI;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2015.03.002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Social emotional information influences self-processing in everyday activities, but few researchers have investigated this process. The current ERP study adopted a prime paradigm to investigate how socially threatening faces impact on the self-face processing advantage. After being primed with emotional faces (happy, angry or neutral), participants judged whether the target face (self, friend, and stranger) was familiar or unfamiliar. Results showed an interaction effect between the prime face and the target face at posterior P3, suggesting that after priming with happy and neutral faces, self-faces elicited larger P3 amplitudes than friend-faces and stranger-faces; however, after priming with angry faces, the P3 amplitudes were not significantly different between self-face and friend-face. Moreover, the P3 amplitudes of self-faces did not differ between priming with angry and neutral faces; however, the P3 amplitude of both friend-faces and stranger-faces showed enhanced responses after priming with angry faces compared to priming with neutral faces. We suggest that the self-face processing advantage (self vs. friend) could be weakened by priming with threatening faces, through enhancement of the other-faces processing rather than suppression of self-faces processing in angry vs. neutral face prime. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 107
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Multivariate ERP Analysis of Neural Activations Underlying Processing of Aesthetically Manipulated Self-Face
    Doi, Hirokazu
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (24):
  • [22] Self-face advantage over familiar and unfamiliar faces: A three-level meta-analytic approach
    Bortolon, Catherine
    Raffard, Stephane
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (04) : 1287 - 1300
  • [23] Do I Have My Attention? Speed of Processing Advantages for the Self-Face Are Not Driven by Automatic Attention Capture
    Keyes, Helen
    Dlugokencka, Aleksandra
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [25] Present and past selves: a steady-state visual evoked potentials approach to self-face processing
    Kotlewska, I.
    Wojcik, M. J.
    Nowicka, M. M.
    Marczak, K.
    Nowicka, A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [26] The 'Narcissus Effect': Top-down alpha-beta band modulation of face-related brain areas during self-face processing
    Alzueta, Elisabet
    Melcon, Maria
    Jensen, Ole
    Capilla, Almudena
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2020, 213
  • [27] Self-face processing in relation to self-referential tasks in 24-month-old infants: A study through eye movements and pupillometry measures
    Nitta, Hiroshi
    Uto, Yusuke
    Chaya, Kengo
    Hashiya, Kazuhide
    [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2025, 127
  • [28] Self-Construal Priming Affects Holistic Face Processing and Race Categorization, but Not Face Recognition
    Liu, Xinge
    Liang, Xingfen
    Feng, Cong
    Zhou, Guomei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [29] Looking at My Own Face: Visual Processing Strategies in Self-Other Face Recognition
    Chakraborty, Anya
    Chakrabarti, Bhismadev
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [30] The Influence of Face Inversion and Spatial Frequency on the Self-Positive Expression Processing Advantage
    Yin, Yueyang
    Yuan, Yu
    Zhang, Lin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9