Effect of impulse duration on patients' perception of electrical stimulation and block effectiveness during axillary block in unsedated ambulatory patients

被引:30
作者
Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ [1 ]
Rassmussen, H [1 ]
Jepsen, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Ctr Head & Orthoped, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
关键词
anesthetic techniques : axillary block; nerve stimulators; pain; anesthetics; mepivacaine; ropivacaine;
D O I
10.1053/rapm.2001.26217
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Backgrounds and Objectives: Chronaxie of the motor-neurons (A-alpha) is shorter than that of the sensory A-delta and C neurons. Therefore, a short current impulse should elicit a painless muscle twitch. This randomized, double-blind study of patients having ambulatory axillary block by multiple neurostimulations compared patients' perception of electrical stimulation, latency, and quality of analgesia and the incidence of adverse effects. Methods: In group S (short impulse, n = 44) 0.1-ms-current impulses were used and in group L (long impulse, n = 43) 0.3-ms impulses were used. Initial amplitude was 2 mA. Local anesthetic was injected near the 4 terminal nerves (musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, radial) after reaching a target amplitude between 0.1 and 0.5 mA. Patients were specifically requested to categorize sensation of electrical stimulation "electric shocks" as follows: no discomfort, discomfort, pain. Pain was then quantified on a visual analog scale (VAS). Surgically ineffective blocks were supplemented after 30 minutes. A patient was defined as ready for surgery (complete block) when analgesia was present in all areas distal to the elbow. Results: There were no significant differences between groups in quali- and quantitative assessments of electrical stimulation. Eight patients (18%) in either group described the sensation as "strange or funny." Eight patients in group S and 13 (30%) in group L reported discomfort during stimulation. Twenty-eight patients (64%) in S group and 22 (52%) in L group experienced pain. Median VAS (0 to 100) of this pain was 21 and 24, respectively. Block performance time was 9 minutes in L group and 11 minutes in S group (P < .001), but the latency of analgesia was 23 minutes for both groups and the times to achieve complete block were, therefore, similar: 32 minutes in L group and 34 minutes in S group (not significant [NS]). Nine group S and 8 group L patients required supplementary blocks (NS). The incidence of vessel punctures and accidental intravascular injections were also similar in both groups. Conclusions: This study did not confirm our hypothesis that short-current impulses (0.1 ms) make neurostimulation of peripheral nerves painless, by selectively depolarizing motor-neurons. Longer impulses (0.3 ms) shorten block performance time, probably by easier location of the nerves, but the clinical relevance of this finding is doubtful.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 433
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block: A clinical comparison with 0.5% bupivacaine
    Bertini, L
    Tagariello, V
    Mancini, S
    Ciaschi, A
    Posteraro, CM
    Di Benedetto, P
    Martini, O
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1999, 24 (06) : 514 - 518
  • [2] The use of a selective axillary nerve block for outpatient hand surgery
    Bouaziz, H
    Narchi, P
    Mercier, FJ
    Khoury, A
    Poirier, T
    Benhamou, D
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (04) : 746 - 748
  • [3] CASEY KL, 1971, COMMUNICATION
  • [4] Nerve stimulator and multiple injection technique for upper and lower limb blockade: Failure rate, patient acceptance, and neurologic complications
    Fanelli, G
    Casati, A
    Garancini, P
    Torri, G
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (04) : 847 - 852
  • [5] GASSER HS, 1937, ELECT SIGNS NERVOUS, P1
  • [6] KAISER H, 1990, ANAESTHESIST REG ANA, V13, P143
  • [7] Sedation with sufentanil and midazolam decreases pain in patients undergoing upper limb surgery under multiple nerve block
    Kinirons, BP
    Bouaziz, H
    Paqueron, X
    Ababou, A
    Jandard, C
    Cao, MM
    Bur, ML
    Laxenaire, MC
    Benhamou, D
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (05) : 1118 - 1121
  • [8] Low dose axillary block by targeted injections of the terminal nerves
    Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ
    Nielsen, PR
    Sorensen, T
    Stenor, M
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1999, 46 (07): : 658 - 664
  • [9] Comparison of transarterial and multiple nerve stimulation techniques for axillary block using a high dose of mepivacaine with adrenaline
    Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ
    Nielsen, PR
    Nielsen, SL
    Gardi, T
    Hermann, C
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 43 (04) : 398 - 404
  • [10] KOSLOW M, 1973, EXP NEUROL, V41, P745, DOI 10.1016/0014-4886(73)90065-4