Noninvasive central systolic blood pressure, not peripheral systolic blood pressure, independently predicts the progression of carotid intima-media thickness in a Chinese community-based population

被引:16
作者
Sun, Pengfei [1 ]
Yang, Ying [1 ]
Cheng, Guanliang [1 ]
Fan, Fangfang [1 ]
Qi, Litong [1 ]
Gao, Lan [1 ]
Han, Xiaoning [1 ]
Jia, Jia [1 ]
Hu, Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Cardiol, Hosp 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT); Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP); Peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP); Cohort; Hypertension; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PULSE PRESSURE; HYPERTENSION; DISEASE; ASSOCIATION; INDEXES; STRETCH;
D O I
10.1038/s41440-018-0175-5
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the predictive values of central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) and peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP) for the progression of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). A total of 953 Chinese participants from an atherosclerosis cohort with complete information, including baseline cSBP, questionnaire information, biochemical examination, baseline, and follow-up carotid ultrasonography quantitative data, were included in this study. A multilinear regression model, adjusted for possible covariates, was used to investigate the predictive values of cSBP and pSBP for rate of cIMT change. The average age of all participants was (52.11 +/- 4.74 years). The baseline levels of cSBP, pSBP, max cIMT, and mean cIMT were (132.55 +/- 18.18)mmHg, (130.76 +/- 15.40)mmHg, (813.52 +/- 118.49)mu m and (681.11 +/- 99.90) pm, respectively Those with hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia accounted for 40.71% (388), 18.05% (172), and 70.41% (671), respectively. After 2.3 years of follow-up, the average rates of max and mean cIMT change were 8.70 (-0.49-19.43)% and 2.59 (-4.72-10.81)%, respectively. Per standard deviation increase of cSBP, but not pSBP, was associated with increases of max (for cSBP, beta 1.07, 95%CI 0.18-1.96, p = 0.018; for pSBP,beta 0.48, 95%CI -0.45-1.41, p = 0.315) and mean (for cSBP, beta 0.84%, 95%CI 0.10-1.58, p = 0.027; for pSBP, beta 0.59%, 95%CI -0.18-1.37, p = 0.135) cIMT change rate after adjusting for possible covariates. In conclusion, cSBP, but not pSBP, is independently associated with cIMT progression in our community-based Chinese population. cSBP should be considered for the purpose of CVD primary prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 399
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure - The strong heart study [J].
Roman, Mary J. ;
Devereux, Richard B. ;
Kizer, Jorge R. ;
Lee, Elisa T. ;
Galloway, James M. ;
Ali, Tauqeer ;
Umans, Jason G. ;
Howard, Barbara V. .
HYPERTENSION, 2007, 50 (01) :197-203
[32]   Association of Central and Peripheral Blood Pressures With Intermediate Cardiovascular Phenotypes [J].
Roman, Mary J. ;
Devereux, Richard B. .
HYPERTENSION, 2014, 63 (06) :1148-1153
[33]   Systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure and arterial stiffness as cardiovascular risk factors [J].
Safar, ME .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2001, 10 (02) :257-261
[34]   Central blood pressure and hypertension: role in cardiovascular risk assessment [J].
Safar, Michel E. ;
Jankowski, Piotr .
CLINICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 116 (3-4) :273-282
[35]   Does It Make Sense to Measure Only the Brachial Blood Pressure? [J].
Salvi, Paolo ;
Bellasi, Antonio ;
Di Iorio, Biagio .
BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2013, 36 (01) :21-25
[36]   Essential hypertension [J].
Staessen, JA ;
Wang, JG ;
Bianchi, G ;
Birkenhäger, WH .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9369) :1629-1641
[37]   Mannheim Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Plaque Consensus (2004-2006-2011) An Update on Behalf of the Advisory Board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th Watching the Risk Symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011 [J].
Touboul, P. -J. ;
Hennerici, M. G. ;
Meairs, S. ;
Adams, H. ;
Amarenco, P. ;
Bornstein, N. ;
Csiba, L. ;
Desvarieux, M. ;
Ebrahim, S. ;
Hernandez, R. Hernandez ;
Jaff, M. ;
Kownator, S. ;
Naqvi, T. ;
Prati, P. ;
Rundek, T. ;
Sitzer, M. ;
Schminke, U. ;
Tardif, J. -C. ;
Taylor, A. ;
Vicaut, E. ;
Woo, K. S. .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2012, 34 (04) :290-296
[38]   Ten-year time course of risk factors for increased carotid intima-media thickness: the Hoorn Study [J].
van den Berg, Esther ;
Biessels, Geert Jan ;
Stehouwer, Coen D. A. ;
Kappelle, L. Jaap ;
Heine, Robert J. ;
Nijpels, Giel ;
Dekker, Jacqueline M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION, 2010, 17 (02) :168-174
[39]   Central or peripheral systolic or pulse pressure: which best relates to target organs and future mortality? [J].
Wang, Kang-Ling ;
Cheng, Hao-Min ;
Chuang, Shao-Yuan ;
Spurgeon, Harold A. ;
Ting, Chih-Tai ;
Lakatta, Edward G. ;
Yin, Frank C. P. ;
Chou, Pesus ;
Chen, Chen-Huan .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 27 (03) :461-467
[40]   Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes - Principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study [J].
Williams, B ;
Lacy, PS ;
Thom, SM ;
Cruickshank, K ;
Stanton, A ;
Collier, D ;
Hughes, AD ;
Thurston, H .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 113 (09) :1213-1225