Persuasiveness Web 2.0 in Behavioral Intention: A Conceptual Model

被引:0
作者
Widyasari, Yohana Dewi Lulu [1 ,2 ]
Nugroho, Lukito Edi [1 ]
Permanasari, Adhistya Erna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] Politekn Caltex Riau, Informat Syst, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
来源
2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE INFORMATION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (SIET) | 2017年
关键词
web; 2.0; persuasive technology; behavior; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; ACCEPTANCE; MEDIA; TOOLS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The use of the web 2.0 technology as a work tool or communication tool in individual activities grow significant and has begun to be also used in the organization. The Web 2.0 technology is not just an information technology system but also a social technology, which is still a debate of factors that can influence it. Aspects of social interaction owned by this technology impact on the behavior and attitude of the users. This research proposes a conceptual model intervention of persuasive technology that explains what the factor affect the users? Behavioral intention to use technology in an organization. This study reviews of the web 2.0 technology by using Theory of Planned Behavior and Behavior Change Support Systems to analysis its persuasiveness. In this research will be tested persuasive system design model that has a significant impact on perceptions of persuasion and system usage. More specifically, the proposed model extends Theory of Planned Behavior with seven constructs namely, Perceived Ease of Use, Attitude Toward The Behavior, Perceived Usefulness, Social Influence, Subjective Norm, Self-Efficacy, Perceived Behavioral Control. This proposed model explain factors that affect the usage of the web 2.0 persuasive technology. It offers opportunities for future research in understanding the acceptance of persuasive technology.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 122
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The extended technology acceptance model for Web 2.0 technologies in teaching [J].
Simsek, Ahmet Salih ;
Ates, Huseyin .
INNOEDUCA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION, 2022, 8 (02) :165-183
[42]   On the Application of Web 2.0 [J].
Gu, Yanfeng .
2016 ISSGBM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (ISSGBM-ICS 2016), PT 3, 2016, 68 :351-354
[43]   Building Web 2.0 [J].
Lin, Kwei-Jay .
COMPUTER, 2007, 40 (05) :101-102
[44]   A Typology for Web 2.0 [J].
Dalsgaard, Christian ;
Sorensen, Elsebeth Korsgaard .
7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING, VOL 1, 2008, :272-279
[45]   Journalism in the Web 2.0 [J].
Machado, Mariana Martins ;
Lohmann, Augusto de Freitas ;
Haguenauer, Cristina Jasbinschek .
REVISTA EDUCAONLINE, 2009, 3 (01) :68-89
[46]   Legacy to Web 2.0 [J].
Kumbhar, Hemant ;
Kulkarni, Raj ;
Limkar, Suresh .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRONTIERS OF INTELLIGENT COMPUTING: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS (FICTA) 2013, 2014, 247 :517-525
[47]   A comparison of Web 2.0 tools in a doctoral course [J].
Meyer, Katrina A. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (04) :226-232
[48]   Web 2.0 interactivity in open access repositories [J].
Shafi, S. M. ;
Gul, Sumeer ;
Shah, Tariq Ahmad .
ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2013, 31 (06) :703-712
[49]   WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN TEACHER TRAINING DEGREES [J].
Ipina, N. ;
Brazo, L. ;
Zuberogoitia, A. ;
Goni, M. ;
Pavon, A. .
EDULEARN11: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, :3709-3715
[50]   Recommender System for Web 2.0 Supported eLearning [J].
Dlab, Martina Holenko ;
Hoic-Bozic, Natasa .
2014 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON), 2014, :953-956