Persuasiveness Web 2.0 in Behavioral Intention: A Conceptual Model

被引:0
作者
Widyasari, Yohana Dewi Lulu [1 ,2 ]
Nugroho, Lukito Edi [1 ]
Permanasari, Adhistya Erna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] Politekn Caltex Riau, Informat Syst, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
来源
2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE INFORMATION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (SIET) | 2017年
关键词
web; 2.0; persuasive technology; behavior; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; ACCEPTANCE; MEDIA; TOOLS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The use of the web 2.0 technology as a work tool or communication tool in individual activities grow significant and has begun to be also used in the organization. The Web 2.0 technology is not just an information technology system but also a social technology, which is still a debate of factors that can influence it. Aspects of social interaction owned by this technology impact on the behavior and attitude of the users. This research proposes a conceptual model intervention of persuasive technology that explains what the factor affect the users? Behavioral intention to use technology in an organization. This study reviews of the web 2.0 technology by using Theory of Planned Behavior and Behavior Change Support Systems to analysis its persuasiveness. In this research will be tested persuasive system design model that has a significant impact on perceptions of persuasion and system usage. More specifically, the proposed model extends Theory of Planned Behavior with seven constructs namely, Perceived Ease of Use, Attitude Toward The Behavior, Perceived Usefulness, Social Influence, Subjective Norm, Self-Efficacy, Perceived Behavioral Control. This proposed model explain factors that affect the usage of the web 2.0 persuasive technology. It offers opportunities for future research in understanding the acceptance of persuasive technology.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 122
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   An Integrated Model to Monitor and Evaluate Web 2.0 Project-Based Learning [J].
Grippa, Francesca ;
Secundo, Giustina ;
Passiante, Giuseppina .
VISIONING AND ENGINEERING THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY: A WEB SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5736 :50-59
[22]   Empirical Evidence to Support the Quality of Learning Experienced With the use of Web 2.0 Technologies: An Enhanced Model to Achieved Increased use of Web 2.0 Technologies for Learning Activities [J].
Echeng, Razep ;
Usoro, Abel .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON R-LEARNING (ECEL 2015), 2015, :677-687
[23]   'Capitalism 2.0': Web 2.0 Manifestoes and the New Spirit of Capitalism [J].
Yeritsian, Gary .
CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (4-5) :703-717
[24]   Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Web 2.0 Technologies in the Learning Environment of Nigeria: A Conceptual Framework [J].
Echeng, Razep ;
Usoro, Abel ;
Majewski, Grzegorz .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING, 2013, :444-452
[25]   A blended learning model supported with Web 2.0 technologies [J].
Kose, Utku .
INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 2 (02) :2794-2802
[26]   Web 2.0 [J].
胡泳 .
商务周刊, 2007, (07) :96-96
[27]   Web language. The Linguistic Category Model (LCM) and context of Web 2.0 [J].
Ruggieri, Stefano ;
Boca, Stefano ;
Ballor, Fabio .
PSICOLOGIA SOCIALE, 2014, 9 (01) :83-94
[28]   Web browsers and web 2.0 [J].
Monistrol, Ricard ;
Codina, Lluis .
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2007, 16 (03) :261-267
[29]   Web 2.0 Toolbar: Providing Web 2.0 Services for Existence Web Pages [J].
Hsieh, Ming-Chih ;
Kao, Yung-Wei ;
Yuan, Shyan-Ming .
2008 IEEE ASIA-PACIFIC SERVICES COMPUTING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, :507-512
[30]   PREDICTING FACTORS AFFECTING INTENTION TO USE WEB 2.0 IN LEARNING: EVIDENCE FROM SCIENCE EDUCATION [J].
Muhaimin ;
Habibi, Akhmad ;
Mukminin, Amirul ;
Pratama, Robin ;
Asrial ;
Harja, Harlina .
JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, 18 (04) :595-606