Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants

被引:22
作者
Abd El-Ghany, Mona F. [1 ]
El-Kherbawy, Mohamady I. [1 ]
Abdel-Aal, Youssef A. [1 ]
El-Dek, Samaa I. [2 ]
Abd El-Baky, Tarek [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Soil Dept, Fac Agr, Giza 12613, Egypt
[2] Beni Suef Univ, Mat Sci & Nanotechnol Dept, Fac Postgrad Studies Adv Sci, Bani Suwayf 62511, Egypt
关键词
snap bean; monoammonium phosphate; nano calcium phosphate fertilizer; foliar application; PHOSPHORUS-FERTILIZER; NANOPARTICLES; HYDROXYAPATITE; NUTRITION; RESPONSES; SOIL;
D O I
10.3390/nano11112913
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Recently, nanofertilizers are being tested as a new technology, either for soil or foliar applications, to improve food production and with a reduced environmental impact. Nano calcium phosphate (NCaP) was successfully synthesized, characterized and applied in this study. A pot experiment was carried out in two successive seasons in 2016 and 2017 on (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants to obtain the best phosphorus treatments. The results were applied in a field experiment during the 2018-2019 season. Single superphosphate (SSP) at 30 and 60 kg P2O5 fed(-1) and NCaP at 10%, 20% and 30% from the recommended dose were applied to the soil. Foliar application involved both monoammonium phosphate (MAP) at one rate of 2.5 g L-1 and NCaP at 5% and 10% from the MAP rate. The results of all experiments showed that NCaP significantly increased the shoot and root dry weights, the nutrient content in the shoot and root, the yield components, the nutrient concentration and crude protein percentage in pods of the snap bean plants compared with traditional P. The greatest increase was obtained from a 20% NCaP soil application in combination with a 5% NCaP foliar application. The present study recommends using NCaP as an alternative source of P to mitigate the negative effects of traditional sources.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 57 条
[51]  
Turuko M., 2014, World J. Agric. Res, V2, P88, DOI DOI 10.12691/WJAR-2-3-1
[52]  
Uarrota V. G., 2010, Journal of Agronomy, V9, P87, DOI 10.3923/ja.2010.87.91
[53]  
Upadhyaya H., 2017, J PLANT SCI PHYTOPAT, V1, P1, DOI [10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001001, DOI 10.29328/JOURNAL.JPSP.1001001]
[54]  
Vance CP, 2001, PLANT PHYSIOL, V127, P390, DOI 10.1104/pp.010331
[55]   TiO2 nanoparticles dose, application method and phosphorous levels influence genotoxicity in Rice (Oryza sativa L.), soil enzymatic activities and plant growth [J].
Waani, S. Phziya Tariq ;
Irum, Shagufta ;
Gul, Iram ;
Yaqoob, Khurram ;
Khalid, Muhammad Usman ;
Ali, Muhammad Arif ;
Manzoor, Umair ;
Noor, Tayyaba ;
Ali, Shafaqat ;
Rizwan, Muhammad ;
Arshad, Muhammad .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2021, 213
[56]  
Youssef SM, 2017, GESUNDE PFLANZ, V69, P139, DOI 10.1007/s10343-017-0398-4
[57]   Changes in fluorescent dissolved organic matter and their association with phytoavailable phosphorus in soil amended with TiO2 nanoparticles [J].
Zahra, Zahra ;
Maqbool, Tahir ;
Arshad, Muhammad ;
Badshah, Mohsin Ali ;
Choi, Hyung-Kyoon ;
Hur, Jin .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2019, 227 :17-25