Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up

被引:35
作者
van Dijken, JWV [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Odontol, Dent Sch Umea, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
关键词
adhesion; cement; clinical; dental material; glass ionomer; resin; sclerosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical retention of a new resin-modified glass ionomer cement based adhesive combined with a hybrid resin composite or a poly-acid modified resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions during a 6-year period. Methods. The resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive (Fuji Bond LC), was placed in 73 cervical lesions, 36 with a universal hybrid resin composite (Tetric Ceram) and 37 with a poly-acid modified resin composite (Hytac). Fifty-one in lesions with sclerotic dentin and 22 in non-sclerotic ones. Of the sclerotic lesions 38 were slightly roughened with a diamond bur before conditioning. The restorations were evaluated with slightly modified USPHS criteria every six months during a 6-year period. Results. All except six restorations were evaluated during the 6 years. Twelve (17.9%) were lost, four Tetric Ceram (11.8%) and eight Hytac (24.2%) (p<0.05). Four were found in non-sclerotic lesions (20.0%) and eight in sclerotic lesions (17.0%). The differences between the sclerotic and non-sclerotic and the roughened and non-roughened lesions were not significant. Conclusions. The resin-modified glass adhesive showed a superior clinical retention combined with the resin composite material, with an annual failure rate of 2%. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 547
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abdalla A I, 1997, Quintessence Int, V28, P255
[2]  
Andersson-Wenckert IE, 2004, AM J DENT, V17, P43
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1956, NONPARAMETRIC STAT
[4]  
Browning WD, 1999, OPER DENT, V24, P26
[5]  
Burrow MF, 1998, OPER DENT, V23, P290
[6]  
Folwaczny M, 2000, OPER DENT, V25, P251
[7]  
GLADYS S, 1997, THESIS LEUVEN
[8]   Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives [J].
Gordan, VV ;
Boyer, D ;
Soderholm, KJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1998, 26 (5-6) :497-503
[9]   EXAMINING TOOTH FLEXURE EFFECTS ON CERVICAL RESTORATIONS - A 2-YEAR CLINICAL-STUDY [J].
HEYMANN, HO ;
STURDEVANT, JR ;
BAYNE, S ;
WILDER, AD ;
SLUDER, TB ;
BRUNSON, WD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 122 (06) :41-47
[10]   MARGINAL INTEGRITY RELATED TO BOND STRENGTH AND STRAIN CAPACITY OF COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIVE SYSTEMS [J].
KEMPSCHOLTE, CM ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1990, 64 (06) :658-664