Phenotyping in acute respiratory distress syndrome: state of the art and clinical implications

被引:17
|
作者
Alipanah, Narges [1 ]
Calfee, Carolyn S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care Allergy & Sleep Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Anesthesia, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
acute respiratory distress syndrome; critical care; phenotyping; precision medicine; ACUTE LUNG INJURY; GLYCATION END-PRODUCTS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; EOSINOPHILIC ASTHMA; RECEPTOR; SUBPHENOTYPES; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; ONSET; ARDS;
D O I
10.1097/MCC.0000000000000903
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose of review Decades of research in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have led to few interventions that impact clinical outcomes. The pandemic of patients with ARDS due to the novel SARS-CoV-2 infection has stressed the need for more effective therapies in ARDS. Phenotyping may enable successful trials and precision therapeutics in this patient population. Recent findings Clinical phenotypes that group patients by shared cause, time-course or radiographic presentation are of prognostic value, but their use is limited by misclassification. Physiological phenotypes, including the P/F ratio, ventilatory ratio and dead space fraction, predict poor outcomes but can rapidly change, making them unstable over time. Biologic phenotypes have prognostic value with composite clinical and biomarker sub-phenotypes additionally impacting treatment response but are yet to be prospectively validated. Although much progress has been made in ARDS phenotyping, implementation of precision medicine practices will depend on conducting phenotype-aware trials using rapid point of care assays or machine learning algorithms. Omics studies will enhance our understanding of biologic determinants of clinical outcomes in ARDS sub-phenotypes. Whether biologic ARDS sub-phenotypes are specific to this syndrome or rather more broadly identify endotypes of critical illness remains to be determined.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biological Phenotyping in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Sinha, Pratik
    Meyer, Nuala J.
    Calfee, Carolyn S.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, 2023, 74 : 457 - 471
  • [2] Acute respiratory distress syndrome Diagnostics and treatment state of the art
    Kersten, A.
    Cornelissen, C.
    PNEUMOLOGE, 2020, 17 (04): : 238 - 248
  • [3] Biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Jabaudon, Matthieu
    Blondonnet, Raiko
    Ware, Lorraine B.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 27 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [4] Acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Hecker, M.
    Weigand, M. A.
    Mayer, K.
    INTERNIST, 2012, 53 (05): : 557 - +
  • [5] Acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Mason, Christopher
    Dooley, Nessa
    Griffiths, Mark
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2017, 17 (05) : 439 - 443
  • [6] Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Prabhakaran, Priya
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2010, 47 (10) : 861 - 868
  • [7] Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) phenotyping
    Shankar-Hari, M.
    Fan, E.
    Ferguson, N. D.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 45 (04) : 516 - 519
  • [8] Machine learning-based COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotyping and clinical outcomes: A systematic review
    Tenda, Eric Daniel
    Henrina, Joshua
    Samosir, Jistrani
    Amalia, Ridha
    Yulianti, Mira
    Pitoyo, Ceva Wicaksono
    Setiati, Siti
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [9] Acute respiratory distress syndrome and the Art of War
    Phua, Jason
    Badia, Joan R.
    Ferguson, Niall D.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (05) : 1798 - 1799
  • [10] The Impact of Aging in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Clinical and Mechanistic Overview
    Brown, Ryan
    McKelvey, Michael C.
    Ryan, Sinead
    Creane, Shannice
    Linden, Dermot
    Kidney, Joseph C.
    McAuley, Daniel F.
    Taggart, Clifford C.
    Weldon, Sinead
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 7