Beyond Open Access: Conceptualizing Open Science for Knowledge Co-creation

被引:5
作者
Maciuliene, Monika [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaunas Univ Technol, Fac Social Sci Arts & Humanities, Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
Open Science; co-creation; stakeholder engagement; science communication; evaluation model; citizen science; INNOVATION; STRATEGY; ECOSYSTEMS; SERVICES; LOGIC; BIAS;
D O I
10.3389/fcomm.2022.907745
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Despite the calls from European Union (EU) and global institutions, such as UNESCO and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for more openness and collaboration between Quadruple Helix actors (government, academia, industry, and civil society), in practice, scientific knowledge creation has been much more closed and fragmented. As an emerging field of study, Open Science (OS) for knowledge co-creation currently requires significantly conceptual and theoretical challenges to be addressed before advancing to practical application. To address this gap, the paper aims to develop a conceptual framework integrating diverse understandings of OS beyond the use of Open Access (OA) and data practices. The author argues that OS should be approached as a complex ecosystem with the potential for knowledge co-creation and social innovations. The underlying premise of the proposed conceptual model is the interdisciplinarity in integrating multiple reference disciplines. Such an approach allows us to learn from other disciplines and contribute to OS research through the emergence of new ideas for theory and practical application. Consequently, a dyadic model is presented where (1) framework conditions regulate how (2) systemic conditions can realize their full potential for knowledge co-creation resulting in outputs (e.g., collaborative projects and citizen science projects) and outcomes (e.g., social innovations, higher quality of science, and democratized knowledge) beneficial for a broad spectrum of stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Adner R, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P98
[2]  
African OS Platform Strategy Workshop, 2018, AFR OP SCI PLATF FUT
[3]   Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Banks, George C. ;
Rogelberg, Steven G. ;
Cascio, Wayne F. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2020, 158 :27-35
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19)
[5]  
Arnkil R., 2010, Exploring Quadruple Helix - Outlining User-Oriented Innovation Models
[6]  
Ayris Paul, 2016, Realising the European open science cloud, DOI DOI 10.2777/940154
[7]  
Blankstein M., 2019, US FACULTY SURVEY 20
[8]  
Bradley J., 2016, OPEN NOTEBOOK SCI PU
[9]   Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems [J].
Cai, Yuzhuo ;
Ma, Jinyuan ;
Chen, Qiongqiong .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (11)
[10]   Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics [J].
Camerer, Colin F. ;
Dreber, Anna ;
Forsell, Eskil ;
Ho, Teck-Hua ;
Huber, Juergen ;
Johannesson, Magnus ;
Kirchler, Michael ;
Almenberg, Johan ;
Altmejd, Adam ;
Chan, Taizan ;
Heikensten, Emma ;
Holzmeister, Felix ;
Imai, Taisuke ;
Isaksson, Siri ;
Nave, Gideon ;
Pfeiffer, Thomas ;
Razen, Michael ;
Wu, Hang .
SCIENCE, 2016, 351 (6280) :1433-1436