A double-blind randomized clinical trial evaluating the analgesic efficacy of ketorolac versus butorphanol for patients with suspected biliary colic in the emergency department

被引:25
|
作者
Olsen, Jon C. [1 ]
McGrath, Norine A. [2 ]
Schwarz, Dana G. [2 ]
Cutcliffe, Brian J. [2 ]
Stern, Jessica L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lutheran Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Park Ridge, IL 60068 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Emergency Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
emergency department; biliary colic; pain; ketorolac; butorphanol;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00178.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected biliary colic often require intravenous (IV) analgesia. The choice of IV analgesia typically includes opioids and ketorolac. Although ultrasound (US) is the initial diagnostic study in these patients, nondiagnostic scans and a high clinical suspicion may require the patient to undergo hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HIDA). Opioids such as morphine interfere with the HIDA scan and thus may limit its value as an analgesic in the ED for these patients. Analgesics that do not interfere with HIDA scanning include ketorolac and butorphanol, an opioid agonist-antagonist. This study evaluates the efficacy of IV ketorolac compared to butorphanol for the treatment of biliary colic pain in the ED. Methods: Between June 2005 and February 2007, a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain suspected to be biliary colic were randomized to receive either 30 mg of IV ketorolac or 1 mg of IV butorphanol. Pain level was assessed using a 1 to 10 "faces" visual analog pain scale initially, as well as 15 and 30 minutes after medication infusion. Side effect profiles and the need for rescue analgesia were also assessed. Patients and clinicians were blinded to the study drug given. Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled in the study. Both groups had similar demographics and baseline pain scores. The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) pain score in the butorphanol group decreased from 7.1 (+/- 1.7) to 2.1 (+/- 2.2) after 30 minutes. The mean (+/- SD) pain score in the ketorolac group decreased from 7.4 (+/- 2.0) to 3.1 (+/- 3.3) after 30 minutes. Both groups had similar needs for rescue analgesia. Side effects included dizziness and sedation with butorphanol and nausea with ketorolac. Conclusions: Although limited by small sample size and convenience sample, this study demonstrates that both ketorolac and butorphanol provide pain relief in biliary colic. Both agents should be considered reasonable options in the ED treatment of biliary colic, especially in patients that may undergo HIDA.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 722
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and Safety of Parecoxib/Phloroglucinol Combination Therapy Versus Parecoxib Monotherapy for Acute Renal Colic: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Weihua Fu
    Jiwei Yao
    Qianwei Li
    Yongquan Wang
    Xiaojun Wu
    Zhansong Zhou
    Wei-Bing Li
    Jun-An Yan
    Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2014, 69 : 157 - 161
  • [22] Comparing intranasal ketamine with intravenous fentanyl in reducing pain in patients with renal colic: A double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Mozafari, Javad
    Verki, Mohammadreza Maleki
    Motamed, Hassan
    Sabouhi, Alireza
    Tirandaz, Fatemeh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (03) : 549 - 553
  • [23] Efficacy of Ketorolac Buccal Infiltrations and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial
    Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh
    Hormozi, Behnoush
    Abbott, Paul V.
    Khalilak, Zohreh
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2016, 42 (05) : 691 - 695
  • [24] Comparing Intradermal Sterile Water with Intravenous Morphine in Reducing Pain in Patients with Renal Colic: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mozafari, Javad
    Verki, Mohammadreza Maleki
    Tirandaz, Fatemeh
    Mahjouri, Reza
    REVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 15 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [25] Comparing Two Different Concentrations of Diphenhydramine Versus Lidocaine for Median Nerve Block in Emergency Department: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Farahmand, Shervin
    Yazdanbakhsh, Fariba
    Bagheri-Hariri, Shahram
    Aliniagerdroudbari, Ehsan
    Abdollahi, Atefeh
    Babaniamansour, Sepideh
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 20 (03) : 190 - 195
  • [26] The effect of ketorolac buccal infiltration on postoperative endodontic pain: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Akhlaghi, Nahid
    Azarshab, Mahsa
    Akhoundi, Nasrin
    Meraji, Naghmeh
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 50 (07): : 540 - 546
  • [27] KETOROLAC VERSUS MEPERIDINE AND HYDROXYZINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE MIGRAINE HEADACHE - A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL
    DUARTE, C
    DUNAWAY, F
    TURNER, L
    ALDAG, J
    FREDERICK, R
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1992, 21 (09) : 1116 - 1121
  • [28] Intranasal ketamine versus intravenous morphine for pain management in patients with renal colic: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Pouraghaei, Mahboub
    Moharamzadeh, Payman
    Paknezhad, Seyed Pouya
    Rajabpour, Zahra Vand
    Soleimanpour, Hassan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (04) : 1263 - 1267
  • [29] Ketamine/Propofol Versus Midazolam/Fentanyl for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Trial
    Nejati, Amir
    Moharari, Reza Shariat
    Ashraf, Haleh
    Labaf, Ali
    Golshani, Keihan
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 18 (08) : 800 - 806
  • [30] Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane blocks for lumbar spine surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Avis, Geoffrey
    Gricourt, Yann
    Vialatte, Pierre Baptiste
    Meunier, Victor
    Perin, Mikael
    Simon, Natacha
    Claret, Pierre-Geraud
    El Fertit, Hassan
    Lefrant, Jean-Yves
    Bertrand, Martin
    Cuvillon, Philippe
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (10) : 610 - 616