Cycle-transitive comparison of independent random variables

被引:41
作者
De Schuymer, B
De Meyer, H
De Baets, B
机构
[1] State Univ Ghent, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] State Univ Ghent, Dept Appl Math Biometr & Proc Control, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
comparison of independent random variables; cycle-transitivity; dice model; isostochastic transitivity; probabilistic relation; stochastic dominance; T-norm;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmva.2004.10.011
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The discrete dice model, previously introduced by the present authors, essentially amounts to the pairwise comparison of a collection of independent discrete random variables that are uniformly distributed on finite integer multisets. This pairwise comparison results in a probabilistic relation that exhibits a particular type of transitivity, called dice-transitivity. In this paper, the discrete dice model is generalized with the purpose of pairwisely comparing independent discrete or continuous random variables with arbitrary probability distributions. It is shown that the probabilistic relation generated by a collection of arbitrary independent random variables is still dice-transitive. Interestingly, this probabilistic relation can be seen as a graded alternative to the concept of stochastic dominance. Furthermore, when the marginal distributions of the random variables belong to the same parametric family of distributions, the probabilistic relation exhibits interesting types of isostochastic transitivity, such as multiplicative transitivity. Finally, the probabilistic relation generated by a collection of independent normal random variables is proven to be moderately stochastic transitive. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 373
页数:22
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
David Herbert Aron, 1963, GRIFFINS STAT MONOGR, V12
[2]   On the cycle-transitivity of the dice model [J].
De Schuymer, B ;
De Meyer, H ;
De Baets, B ;
Jenei, S .
THEORY AND DECISION, 2003, 54 (03) :261-285
[3]  
DEBAETS B, IN PRESS SOC CHOICE
[4]  
DOIGNON JP, 1986, J MATH PSYCHOL, V30, P435, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(86)90020-9
[5]   Comparison functions and choice correspondences [J].
Dutta, B ;
Laslier, JF .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1999, 16 (04) :513-532
[6]  
Fodor J. C., 1994, Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, V14
[7]   Majority decisions based on difference of votes [J].
García-Lapresta, JL ;
Llamazares, B .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 35 (03) :463-481
[8]  
Klement E.P., 2000, TRENDS LOGIC STUDIA
[9]  
Levy H, 1998, STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE
[10]  
Monjardet B., 1988, LECT NOTES EC MATH S, P36