The importance of employee participation and perceptions of changes in procedures in a teamworking intervention

被引:228
作者
Nielsen, Karina [1 ]
Randall, Raymond [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Ctr Working Environm, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Loughborough, Loughborough, Leics, England
关键词
teamwork; participation; intervention; theories-in-use; process evaluation; organizational change; STRESS-MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS; MENTAL-HEALTH; OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH; WORKPLACE; WORK; IMPLEMENTATION; ORGANIZATIONS; PERFORMANCE; SUCCESS; APPRAISALS;
D O I
10.1080/02678373.2012.682721
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The powerful positive results of implementing teamwork are not always achieved. It has been suggested that attempts to implement theories regarding teamwork do not always lead to those theories being put into practice, and as a result positive outcomes are not always found. The participation of employees in the development and implementation of an intervention may help to ensure that changes take place. In this longitudinal study (N=583) of teamwork implementation in Denmark we examined the links between pre-intervention working conditions and well-being, levels of participation in planning and implementation, employees' reports of changes in procedures, and intervention outcomes. Pre-intervention levels of autonomy and job satisfaction predicted the degree of employee participation in the planning and implementation of the intervention. Pre-intervention well-being and social support were linked directly to the degree to which employees reported changes in existing work practices concerning teamwork. In addition, participation and changes in work procedures were significantly associated with post-intervention autonomy, social support and well-being. The results indicate that employee participation in intervention processes is crucial in what appears to be an important association with perceived changes in procedures and, therefore, in intervention outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 111
页数:21
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1963, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research
[4]  
Argyris C., 1995, Journal of Managerial Psychology, V10, P20, DOI DOI 10.1108/02683949510093849
[5]  
Argyris C., 2004, Organizations as knowledge systems: Knowledge, P29, DOI 10.1057/9780230524545
[6]  
Bakker AB., 2007, Journal of Managerial Psychology, V22, P309, DOI [10.1108/02683940710733115.62, DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115, 10.1108/02683940710733115]
[7]   The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 2. A systematic review of task restructuring interventions [J].
Bambra, Clare ;
Egan, Matt ;
Thomas, Sian ;
Petticrew, Mark ;
Whitehead, Margaret .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2007, 61 (12) :1028-1037
[8]   Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: A comparison of the SF-36 mental health subscale and the WHO-Five well-being scale [J].
Bech, P ;
Olsen, LR ;
Kjoller, M ;
Rasmussen, NK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (02) :85-91
[9]  
Bond F W, 2001, J Occup Health Psychol, V6, P290, DOI 10.1037/1076-8998.6.4.290
[10]   What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite [J].
Cohen, SG ;
Bailey, DE .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1997, 23 (03) :239-290