Effects of survival processing and retention interval on true and false recognition in the DRM and category repetition paradigms

被引:4
作者
Parker, Andrew [1 ]
Dagnall, Neil [1 ]
Abelson, Ashley [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Dept Psychol, Brooks Bldg,53 Bonsall St, Manchester M15 6GX, Lancs, England
关键词
Survival processing; false memory; DRM paradigm; category repetition paradigm; remember-know procedure; ADAPTIVE MEMORY; CONJOINT RECOGNITION; DIVIDED ATTENTION; INTENTIONAL USES; EPISODIC MEMORY; OLDER-ADULTS; RECOLLECTION; ITEM; FAMILIARITY; GIST;
D O I
10.1080/09658211.2018.1511808
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two experiments examined the effects of survival processing and delay on true and related false recognition. Experiment 1 used the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm and found survival processing to increase true and related false recognition. Extending the delay from 5-mins to 1-day reduced true, but not false memory. Measures of the characteristics of true and false memories showed survival processing increased "remember" and "know" responses for related false memory, "know" responses for true memory and gist processing. Experiment 2 made use of the category repetition procedure and found a broadly similar pattern of results for true memory. However, related false memory was decreased by survival processing. Except for one result, no interactions were found between encoding task and delay. Overall, survival processing produced similar or different effects on true/false memory depending on the nature of the list. The mechanisms that might underpin these are evaluated and considered in relation to future work.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 367
页数:15
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Adaptive memory: The influence of sleep and wake delay on the survival-processing effect
    Abel, Magdalena
    Baeuml, Karl-Heinz T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 25 (08) : 917 - 924
  • [2] Adaptive memory: Young children show enhanced retention of fitness-related information
    Aslan, Alp
    Baeuml, Karl-Heinz T.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2012, 122 (01) : 118 - 122
  • [3] Conjoint recognition
    Brainerd, CJ
    Reyna, VF
    Mojardin, AH
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (01) : 160 - 179
  • [4] Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection
    Brainerd, CJ
    Wright, R
    Reyna, VF
    Mojardin, AH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (02) : 307 - 327
  • [5] Brainerd CJ., 2005, The science of false memory
  • [6] Burns D.J., 2006, DISTINCTIVENESS MEMO, P109, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195169669.003.0006
  • [7] Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information
    Burns, Daniel J.
    Jenians, Carin L.
    Dean, Erica E.
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2007, 35 (07) : 1630 - 1640
  • [8] An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items
    Burns, DJ
    Martens, NJ
    Bertoni, AA
    Sweeney, EJ
    Lividini, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2006, 32 (02) : 277 - 289
  • [9] Survival Processing in Recognition Memory: Separating Recollection From Familiarity
    Cho, Kit W.
    Kazanas, Stephanie A.
    Altarriba, Jeanette
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 131 (01) : 19 - 32
  • [10] Fit to last: Exploring the longevity of the survival processing effect
    Clark, Daniel P. A.
    Bruno, Davide
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 69 (06) : 1164 - 1178