The humoral immune response to macrocyclic chelating agent DOTA depends on the carrier molecule

被引:0
|
作者
Perico, ME
Chinol, M
Nacca, A
Luison, E
Paganelli, G
Canevari, S
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Div Nucl Med, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Tumori, Dept Expt Oncol, Unit Mol Therapies, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
DOTA; immunogenicity; antimacrocyclic antibodies; receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The chelating agent 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N', N " ,N "'-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) is used to label monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and peptides with Y-90. DOTA allows the generation of clinically useful stable metallic radicconjugates for the treatment of a variety of tumors, but its immunogenicity has remained controversial. In this study, we evaluated the immune response to DOTA in a preclinical mouse model and in patients entered in a clinical trial. Methods: Sera were obtained from BALB/c mice injected intraperitoneally or subcutaneously with different doses and formulations of syngeneic and xenogeneic mAbs or peptide (murine mAb Mov19 [mM19]; its chimeric version; murine V/human C ChiMov19 [cM19]; or Tyr(3)-octreotide)-DOTA conjugates. Sera from patients with neuroendocrine tumors, enrolled in a protocol for somatostatin receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy with Y-90-DOTA-D-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-oct-reotide (DOTATOC), were also collected before and after each treatment. Levels and specificity of antibody response to relevant (Mov19, ChiMov19, or Tyr(3)-octreotide) and nonrelevant (human serum albumin) DOTA targets were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and competition assays. An anti-DOTA mAb (IgG1) derived from a ChiMov19-DOTA immunized mouse was used, in a competitive radioimmunoassay, to determine the efficiency of DOTA presentation on the different carriers. Results: Depending on the immunogenicity and dosage of the mAb, a specific anti-DOTA response was revealed in the preclinical system. However, DOTA-peptide conjugate induced no immune-detectable response against either chelator or carrier. DOTA was poorly presented on small peptides, as determined using the anti-DOTA mAb. Conclusion: A humoral response against DOTA is possible, but only as a consequence of the response elicited against the carrier. Octreotide was not immunogenic. Thus, Y-90-DOTATOC can be considered a safe and useful tool for receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy of somatostatin receptor-overexpress! ng tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:1697 / 1703
页数:7
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据