Conflict and trust: the mediating effects of emotional arousal and self-conscious emotions

被引:32
作者
Chen, Mingkai J. [1 ]
Ayoko, Oluremi B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
关键词
Conflict management; Trust; Positive emotional arousal; Self-conscious emotions; Individual psychology; STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING; TASK CONFLICT; INTERPERSONAL-TRUST; INTRAGROUP CONFLICT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; NEGATIVE EMOTIONS; POSITIVE EMOTION; FIT INDEXES; SHAME; GUILT;
D O I
10.1108/10444061211199313
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Purpose - Researchers suggest that trust building may be challenging in the face of conflict. However, there is an emerging proposition that conflict is critical for trust. Using affective events and attribution theories as a framework, the purpose of this paper is to present a model of the mediating effects of positive emotional arousal and self-conscious emotions in the relationship between conflict and trust. Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected from 325 students enrolled in varied postgraduate programs in a large business school. The authors employed Preacher and Hayes's bootstrapping SPSS macros to test the direct and mediation effects of the connection between conflict, emotions and trust. Findings - Results showed that task, relationship and process conflict were associated with differing aspects of positive emotional arousal (enthusiasm, excitement) and self-conscious emotions (guilt and shame). Similarly, behavioural guilt was linked with trust while emotions mediated the link between conflict and trust. Research limitations/implications The authors acknowledge that there are possible covariates (e.g. how long ago did the conflict occur?) with the variables used in the current study. Future research should include such covariates in the study of the relationship between conflict emotions and trust. Also, the data were largely cross-sectional, drawn from a relatively small sample. In future, researchers should examine similar constructs with longitudinal data and in large organisational sample. In spite of the above limitations, the validity of the results presented in this paper is not compromised. The study extends self-conscious emotions literature by demonstrating that guilt and shame have cognitive and behavioural properties and with differing connections with conflict and trust. Practical implications - The paper's findings suggest that managers who want to engender trust in conflict situations should stimulate task conflict to arouse enthusiasm and excitement. These discrete emotions are critical for building integrity based trust. Alternatively, by managing reparative emotions of guilt effectively, managers may increase levels of perceived trust. Overall, the results suggest that focusing on the effect of conflict on trust without considering the positive emotional arousal and self-conscious emotions could yield disappointing outcomes. Originality/value - The study provides new insights into the influence of conflict on trust and the mediating role of emotions (e.g. guilt and shame) in the link between conflict and trust. The paper also offers a practical assistance to individuals interested in building trust, especially in the face of conflict.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 56
页数:38
相关论文
共 126 条
[61]   Emotional intelligence as a moderator of emotional and behavioral reactions to job insecurity [J].
Jordan, PJ ;
Ashkanasy, NM ;
Hartel, CEJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (03) :361-372
[62]  
Kiffin-Petersen S., 2004, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, V10, P38, DOI [10.5172/jmo.2004.10.1.38, DOI 10.5172/JMO.2004.10.1.38]
[63]   When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation [J].
Kim, PH ;
Dirks, KT ;
Cooper, CD ;
Ferrin, DL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2006, 99 (01) :49-65
[64]   Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations [J].
Kim, PH ;
Ferrin, DL ;
Cooper, CD ;
Dirks, KT .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (01) :104-118
[65]   Top management credibility and employee cynicism: A comprehensive model [J].
Kim, Tae-Yeol ;
Bateman, Thomas S. ;
Gilbreath, Brad ;
Andersson, Lynne M. .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2009, 62 (10) :1435-1458
[66]   Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context [J].
Korsgaard, MA ;
Brodt, SE ;
Whitener, EM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (02) :312-319
[67]   ON CONCEPTUALIZING AND ASSESSING GUILT [J].
KUGLER, K ;
JONES, WH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (02) :318-327
[68]  
Kurtzberg T.R., 2002, THESIS NW U EVANSTON
[69]   Empathy, shame, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking [J].
Leith, KP ;
Baumeister, RF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1998, 66 (01) :1-37
[70]   Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities [J].
Lewicki, RJ ;
Mcallister, DJ ;
Bies, RJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :438-458