Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD

被引:201
作者
De Angelis, Maurizio [1 ]
Perno, Salvatore [1 ]
Reggio, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Roma, Dipartimento Ingn Strutturale & Geotecn, I-00184 Rome, Italy
关键词
seismic protection; Tuned Mass Damper (TMD); large mass ratio; High-Damping Rubber Bearings (HDRB); optimal design; shaking table tests; SEISMIC EFFECTIVENESS; VIBRATION CONTROL; TALL BUILDINGS; DAMPERS; SYSTEMS; IDENTIFICATION; PARAMETERS; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.1117
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the dynamic behavior and the seismic effectiveness of a non-conventional Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) with large mass ratio. Compared with conventional TMD, the device mass is increased up to be comparable with the mass of the structure to be protected, aiming at a better control performance. In order to avoid the introduction of an excessive additional weight, masses already present on the structure are converted into tuned masses, retaining structural or architectural functions beyond the mere control function. A reduced order model is introduced for design purposes and the optimal design of a large mass ratio TMD for seismic applications is then formulated. The design method is specifically developed to implement High-Damping Rubber Bearings (HDRB) to connect the device mass to the main structure, taking advantage of combining stiffness and noticeable damping characteristics. Ground acceleration is modeled as a Gaussian random process with white noise power spectral density. A numerical searching technique is used to obtain the optimal design parameter, the frequency ratio alpha, which minimizes the root-mean-square displacement response of the main structure. The study finally comprises shaking table tests on a 1:5 scale model under a wide selection of accelerograms, both artificial and natural, to assess the seismic effectiveness of the proposed large mass ratio TMD. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 60
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]  
Holmes D, 1995, ENG STRUCT, V17, P676
[12]   Structural control: Past, present, and future [J].
Housner, GW ;
Bergman, LA ;
Caughey, TK ;
Chassiakos, AG ;
Claus, RO ;
Masri, SF ;
Skelton, RE ;
Soong, TT ;
Spencer, BF ;
Yao, JTP .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 1997, 123 (09) :897-971
[13]  
JUANG JN, 1988, CONTR-THEOR ADV TECH, V4, P5
[14]  
KAYNIA AM, 1981, J STRUCT DIV-ASCE, V107, P1465
[15]  
Kelly J.M., 1993, EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
[16]   Vibration control identification of seismically excited m.d.o.f. structure-PTMD systems [J].
Lin, CC ;
Wang, JF ;
Ueng, JM .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2001, 240 (01) :87-115
[17]   Robust design of mass-uncertain rolling-pendulum TMDs for the seismic protection of buildings [J].
Matta, Emiliano ;
De Stefano, Alessandro .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 23 (01) :127-147
[18]  
Naeim F, 1999, EARTHQ SPECTRA
[19]  
Ormondroyd J, 1946, T ASME, V13, pA
[20]   Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers for damage reduction of structures [J].
Pinkaew, T ;
Lukkunaprasit, P ;
Chatupote, P .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2003, 25 (01) :39-46