Interest of the MGAP score on in-hospital trauma patients: Comparison with TRISS, ISS and NISS scores

被引:5
作者
Larkin, Emily J. [1 ]
Jones, Marieke K. [2 ]
Young, Steven D. [1 ]
Young, Jeffrey S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Surg, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Claude Moore Hlth Sci Lib, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2022年 / 53卷 / 09期
关键词
Mortality prediction; Trauma scoring; Injury severity; Triage; Trauma; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; TRIAGE TOOL; MORTALITY; PREDICTION; SYSTEMS; AREA; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.024
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Trauma scoring systems were created to predict mortality and enhance triage capabilities. However, ef-ficacy of scoring systems to predict mortality and accuracy of originally reported severity thresholds re-mains uncertain. A single-center, retrospective study was conducted at University of Virginia (UVA), an American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma center. We compared four scoring systems: MGAP (Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and arterial pressure), Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), and Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS) to predict in-hospital mortal-ity and disposition from the emergency department to higher acuity level of care including mortality (i.e. operating room, intensive care unit, morgue) versus standard floor admission using area under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic analysis. Second, we examined sensitivity of these scores at standard thresholds to determine if adjustments were needed to minimize under-triage (sensitivity >= 95%). TRISS was the best predictor of mortality in a cohort of n = 16,265 with AUC of 0.920 (95% CI: 0.911-0.929, p < 0.0 0 01), followed by MGAP with AUC of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.889-0.911, p < 0.0 0 01), and fi-nally ISS and NISS (0.830 (95% CI: 0.814-0.847) and 0.827 (95% CI: 0.809-0.844) respectively). NISS was the best predictor of high acuity disposition with an AUC of 0.729 (95% CI: 0.721-0.736, p < 0.0 0 01), fol-lowed by ISS with AUC of 0.714 (95% CI: 0.707-0.722, p < 0.0 0 01), and finally TRISS and MGAP (0.673 (95% CI: 0.665-0.682) and 0.613 (95% CI: 0.604-0.621) respectively ( p < 0.0 0 01). At historic thresholds, no scor-ing system displayed adequate sensitivity to predict mortality, with values ranging from 73% for ISS to 80% for NISS. In conclusion, in the reported study cohort, TRISS was the best predictor of mortality while NISS was the best predictor of high acuity disposition. We also stress updating scoring system thresholds to achieve ideal sensitivity, and investigating how scoring systems derived to predict mortality perform when predicting indicators of morbidity such as disposition from the emergency department. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3059 / 3064
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Value of the Glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial blood pressure score for predicting the mortality of major trauma patients presenting to the emergency department [J].
Ahun, Erhan ;
Koksal, Ozlem ;
Sigirli, Deniz ;
Torun, Gokhan ;
Donmez, Serdar Suha ;
Armagan, Erol .
ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2014, 20 (04) :241-247
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, RESOURCES OPTIMAL CA
[3]   INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE [J].
BAKER, SP ;
ONEILL, B ;
HADDON, W ;
LONG, WB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03) :187-196
[4]   Prediction of intra-hospital mortality after severe trauma: which pre-hospital score is the most accurate? [J].
Bouzat, Pierre ;
Legrand, Robin ;
Gillois, Pierre ;
Ageron, Francois-Xavier ;
Brun, Julien ;
Savary, Dominique ;
Champly, Frederic ;
Albaladejo, Pierre ;
Payen, Jean-Francois .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (01) :14-18
[5]   EVALUATING TRAUMA CARE - THE TRISS METHOD [J].
BOYD, CR ;
TOLSON, MA ;
COPES, WS .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1987, 27 (04) :370-378
[6]   The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms [J].
Bradley, AP .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1997, 30 (07) :1145-1159
[7]   Measuring injury severity: Time for a change? [J].
Brenneman, FD ;
Boulanger, BR ;
McLellan, BA ;
Redelmeier, DA .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1998, 44 (04) :580-582
[8]   Evaluation and Comparison of Different Prehospital Triage Scores of Trauma Patients on In-Hospital Mortality [J].
Cassignol, Arnaud ;
Markarian, Thibaut ;
Cotte, Jean ;
Marmin, Julien ;
Nguyen, Cedric ;
Cardinale, Mickael ;
Pauly, Vanessa ;
Kerbaul, Francois ;
Meaudre, Eric ;
Bobbia, Xavier .
PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2019, 23 (04) :543-550
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionTen leading causes of death and injuryunintentional injury, 2013, INJURY PREVENT CONTR
[10]   A REVISION OF THE TRAUMA SCORE [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
SACCO, WJ ;
COPES, WS ;
GANN, DS ;
GENNARELLI, TA ;
FLANAGAN, ME .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1989, 29 (05) :623-629