Foot pressure distribution in children with cerebral palsy while standing

被引:22
作者
Galli, Manuela [1 ,2 ]
Cimolin, Veronica [1 ]
Pau, Massimiliano [3 ]
Leban, Bruno [3 ]
Brunner, Reinald [4 ]
Albertini, Giorgio [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Elect Informat & Bioengn, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Tosinvest Sanita, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cagliari, Dept Mech Chem & Mat Engn, Cagliari, Italy
[4] Childrens Univ Hosp Basel UKBB, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Cerebral palsy; Posture; Foot; Arch Index plantar pressure; Standing; Rehabilitation; GAIT ANALYSIS; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2015.05.006
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Foot deformity is a major component of impaired functioning in cerebral palsy (CP). While gait and balance issues related to CP have been studied extensively, there is little information to date on foot-ground interaction (i.e. contact area and plantar pressure distribution). This study aimed to characterize quantitatively the foot-ground contact parameters during static upright standing in hemiplegia and diplegia. We studied 64 children with hemiplegia (mean age 8.2 years; SD 2.8 years) and 43 with diplegia (mean age 8.8 years; SD 2.3 years) while standing on both legs statically on a pressure sensitive mat. We calculated pressure data for the whole foot and sub-regions (i.e. rearfoot, midfoot and forefoot) and average contact pressure. The Arch Index (AI) served for classifying the feet as flat, normal or cavus feet. The data were compared with those from a sample of age- and gender-matched participants (control group, 68 children). Most of the feet showed very high AI values, thus indicating a flat foot. This deformity was more common in diplegia (74.4%) than in hemiplegia (54.7%). In both diplegic and hemiplegic children, average plantar pressure was significantly increased in the forefoot and midfoot and decreased in the rearfoot (p < 0.001). The present data indicate an increased load on the front parts of the foot, which may be due to plantarflexor overactivity or knee flexion, combined with an increased incidence of low foot arches. As a low foot arch does not necessarily increase forefoot load, this deformity can be regarded as secondary. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Effects of gastrocnemius fascia lengthening on gait pattern in children with cerebral palsy using the Gait Profile Score
    Braun Ferreira, Luiz Alfredo
    Cimolin, Veronica
    Costici, Pier Francesco
    Albertini, Giorgio
    Oliveira, Claudia Santos
    Galli, Manuela
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 35 (05) : 1137 - 1143
  • [2] THE ARCH INDEX - A USEFUL MEASURE FROM FOOTPRINTS
    CAVANAGH, PR
    RODGERS, MM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1987, 20 (05) : 547 - 551
  • [3] The Role of Gait Analysis in Treating Gait Abnormalities in Cerebral Palsy
    Chang, Frank M.
    Rhodes, Jason T.
    Flynn, Katherine M.
    Carollo, James J.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 41 (04) : 489 - 506
  • [4] Cimolin V, 2007, Eura Medicophys, V43, P303
  • [5] Dziuba A, 2008, ACTA BIOENG BIOMECH, V10, P3
  • [6] CAVUS FOOT IN CEREBRAL-PALSY
    EILERT, RE
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE, 1984, 4 (04): : 185 - 187
  • [7] Measurement of plantar pressure distribution in hemiplegic children:: changes to adaptative gait patterns in accordance with deficiency
    Femery, V
    Moretto, P
    Renaut, H
    Thévenon, A
    Lensel, G
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (05) : 406 - 413
  • [8] Gage JR, 2004, TREATMENT GAIT PROBL
  • [9] Computerized gait analysis of Botulinum Toxin treatment in children with cerebral palsy
    Galli, Manuela
    Cimolin, Veronica
    Valente, Enza Maria
    Crivellini, Marcello
    Ialongo, Tamara
    Albertin, Giorgio
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2007, 29 (08) : 659 - 664
  • [10] Gait patterns in hemiplegic children with Cerebral Palsy: Comparison of right and left hemiplegia
    Galli, Manuela
    Cimolin, Veronica
    Rigoldi, Chiara
    Tenore, Nunzio
    Albertini, Giorgio
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2010, 31 (06) : 1340 - 1345