The Carers' Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D): development, validity and reliability

被引:40
|
作者
Wancata, J
Krautgartner, M
Berner, J
Alexandrowicz, R
Unger, A
Kaiser, G
Marquart, B
Weiss, M
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Psychiat, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Klagenfurt, Inst Psychol, Klagenfurt, Austria
关键词
dementia; caregiver; needs assessment; service evaluation; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610205001699
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: A variety of interventions are available to support the caregivers of dementia patients. For the purposes of service planning, we developed an instrument to assess the needs of these caregivers and to determine whether needs are met. The reliability and validity of this new instrument was also investigated. Methods: The development of the Carets' Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D), was based on in-depth interviews and a focus group. The combined inter-rater and test-retest reliability was investigated among 45 dementia caregivers. Correlations of the CNA-D with the Zarit Burden Inventory were used to analyze concurrent validity. Content validity was investigated by performing a separate survey among 40 caregivers and 40 professionals. Results: The CNA-D is a semi-structured research interview including 18 problem areas. For each problem area, the CNA-D offers several possible interventions. The relevance of the problem areas and the interventions (content validity) was confirmed by most of the study participants. Significant positive associations were found between the total score of the Zarit Burden Inventory and the number of problems and the number of unmet needs according to the CNA-D. The agreement between the interviewers was "excellent" (K above 0.75) in 73.7% of the problem areas and in 69.9% of the interventions. Conclusions: The CNA-D is a valid and reliable instrument for comprehensively assessing the needs of dementia caregivers.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 406
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and field-testing of the Dementia Carer Assessment of Support Needs Tool (DeCANT)
    Clemmensen, Trine Holt
    Kristensen, Hanne Kaae
    Andersen-Ranberg, Karen
    Lauridsen, Henrik Hein
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2021, 33 (04) : 405 - 417
  • [22] Reliability and validity of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale for patients with traumatic brain injury
    Cheng, Yun
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhang, Yi
    Wu, Ye-Huan
    Zhang, Shuang
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2022, 29 (05) : 1160 - 1166
  • [23] Validity and reliability of a needs analysis questionnaire for the development of a creativity module
    Govindasamy, Parthiban
    Cumming, Therese M.
    Abdullah, Noraini
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS, 2024, 24 (03): : 637 - 652
  • [24] Development, reliability, and validity of the mobility assessment scale in hospitalized patients (HMob)
    Ramos, Isis Resende
    Santos, Joice Sousa
    dos Santos, Maria Cecilia Pires
    da Silva, Daruane Ferreira
    Alves, Iura Gonzalez Nogueira
    Neto, Mansueto Gomes
    Martinez, Bruno Prata
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2024, 28 (02)
  • [25] A risk assessment scale for the prediction of pressure sore development: reliability and validity
    Lindgren, M
    Unosson, M
    Krantz, AM
    Ek, AC
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2002, 38 (02) : 190 - 199
  • [26] Reliability and Validity of Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale in Turkish Population
    Ayan, Gizem
    Afacan, Ceyda
    Poyraz, Burc Cagri
    Bilgic, Onur
    Avci, Suna
    Yavuzer, Hakan
    Yuruyen, Mehmet
    Erdincler, Deniz Suna
    Ayan, Burak
    Doventas, Alper
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS, 2019, 34 (01): : 34 - 40
  • [27] Development of Classroom Assessment Environment Scale (CAES): Validity and Reliability Study
    Ilhan, Mustafa
    Cetin, Bayram
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2014, 39 (176): : 31 - 50
  • [28] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in patients with the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia
    Nakaaki, Shutaro
    Murata, Yoshie
    Sato, Junko
    Shinagawa, Yoshihiro
    Matsui, Teruo
    Tatsumi, Hiroshi
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2007, 61 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [29] Development of the Japanese version of the stroke stigma scale: a validity and reliability assessment
    Kitamura, Shin
    Miyamoto, Reiko
    Watanabe, Shota
    Yoshida, Taiki
    Ishii, Yoshikazu
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2024, 31 (07) : 745 - 754
  • [30] A person-centred approach in nursing: Validity and reliability of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool
    Alvariza, Anette
    Holm, Maja
    Benkel, Inger
    Norinder, Maria
    Ewing, Gail
    Grande, Gunn
    Hakanson, Cecilia
    Ohlen, Joakim
    Arestedt, Kristofer
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2018, 35 : 1 - 8