Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process

被引:774
作者
Lindgren, Britt-Marie [1 ]
Lundman, Berit [1 ]
Graneheim, Ulla H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Nursing, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ West, Dept Hlth Sci, Trollhattan, Sweden
关键词
Abstraction; De-contextualisation; Interpretation; Qualitative content analysis; Re-contextualisation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Qualitative content analysis and other 'standardised' methods are sometimes considered to be technical tools used for basic, superficial, and simple sorting of text, and their results lack depth, scientific rigour, and evidence. To strengthen the trustworthiness of qualitative content analyses, we focus on abstraction and interpretation during the analytic process. To our knowledge, descriptions of these concepts are sparse; this paper therefore aims to elaborate on and exemplify the distinction and relation between abstraction and interpretation during the different phases of the process of qualitative content analysis. We address the relations between abstraction and interpretation when selecting, condensing, and coding meaning units and creating categories and themes on various levels. The examples used are based on our experiences of teaching and supervising students at various levels. We also highlight the phases of de-contextualisation and re-contextualisation in describing the analytic process. We argue that qualitative content analysis can be both descriptive and interpretative. When the data allow interpretations of the latent content, qualitative content analysis reveals both depth and meaning in participants' utterances. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Berelson B., 1952, Content analysis in communication research, DOI DOI 10.1177/000271625228300135
[2]   Thematic analysis and its reconceptualization as 'saliency analysis' [J].
Buetow, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2010, 15 (02) :123-125
[3]   The question of meaning-a momentous issue for qualitative research [J].
Dahlberg, Helena ;
Dahlberg, Karin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES ON HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 2019, 14 (01)
[4]  
Dahlgren L., 2019, Qualitative Methodology for International Public Health, V3rd
[5]  
Downe-Wamboldt B, 1992, Health Care Women Int, V13, P313
[6]   The qualitative content analysis process [J].
Elo, Satu ;
Kyngaes, Helvi .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) :107-115
[7]   Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness [J].
Elo, Satu ;
Kaariainen, Maria ;
Kanste, Outi ;
Polkki, Tarja ;
Utriainen, Kati ;
Kyngas, Helvi .
SAGE OPEN, 2014, 4 (01)
[8]   Context and methodological decontextualization in nursing research with examples from phenomenography [J].
Friberg, F ;
Dahlberg, K ;
Petersson, MN ;
Öhlén, JJ .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2000, 14 (01) :37-43
[9]   Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness [J].
Graneheim, UH ;
Lundman, B .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2004, 24 (02) :105-112
[10]   Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper [J].
Graneheim, Ulla H. ;
Lindgren, Britt-Marie ;
Lundman, Bent .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2017, 56 :29-34