Subnational AI policy: shaping AI in a multi-level governance system

被引:10
作者
Liebig, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Guttel, Licinia [1 ,2 ]
Jobin, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Katzenbach, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bremen, Ctr Media Commun & Informat Res, ZeMKI, Linzer Str 4, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[2] Alexander von Humboldt Inst Internet & Soc, Franzosische Str 9, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Artificial intelligence; AI policy; Federalism; Governance; Qualitative analysis; FEDERALISM;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-022-01561-5
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The promises and risks of Artificial Intelligence permeate current policy statements and have attracted much attention by AI governance research. However, most analyses focus exclusively on AI policy on the national and international level, overlooking existing federal governance structures. This is surprising because AI is connected to many policy areas, where the competences are already distributed between the national and subnational level, such as research or economic policy. Addressing this gap, this paper argues that more attention should be dedicated to subnational efforts to shape AI and asks which themes are discussed in subnational AI policy documents with a case study of Germany's 16 states. Our qualitative analysis of 34 AI policy documents issued on the subnational level demonstrates that subnational efforts focus on knowledge transfer between research and industry actors, the commercialization of AI, different economic identities of the German states, and the incorporation of ethical principles. Because federal states play an active role in AI policy, analysing AI as a policy issue on different levels of government is necessary and will contribute to a better understanding of the developments and implementations of AI strategies in different national contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1490
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Allocating responsibilities in multi-level governance for sustainable development [J].
Karlsson, Sylvia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 34 (1-2) :103-126
[32]   Introductory essay: Polar regions and multi-level governance [J].
Stokke, Olav Schram .
POLAR JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (02) :249-268
[33]   Multi-level Governance and Local Government Reform in Pakistan [J].
Taj, Aamer ;
Baker, Keith .
PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2018, 18 (04) :267-281
[34]   Public policy in multi-level systems: A new research agenda for the study of regional-level policy [J].
Kleider, Hanna .
REGIONAL AND FEDERAL STUDIES, 2022, 32 (03) :277-305
[35]   Challenges and opportunities for energy system modelling to foster multi-level governance of energy transitions [J].
Hofbauer, Leonhard ;
McDowall, Will ;
Pye, Steve .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 161
[36]   Multi-level Governance in a Canadian Setting: The Reform of the Detroit River Border Crossing [J].
Sutcliffe, John B. .
REGIONAL AND FEDERAL STUDIES, 2012, 22 (02) :141-158
[37]   Beyond "Good Governance": The Multi-level Politics of Health Insurance for the Poor in Indonesia [J].
Fossati, Diego .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 87 :291-306
[38]   Policy integration in urban policies as multi-level policy mixes [J].
Dorado-Rubin, Maria Jose ;
Guerrero-Mayo, Maria Jose ;
Navarro-Yanez, Clemente Jesus .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2025, 58 (01) :45-67
[39]   GAI as a Catalyst in National Technology Sovereignty: Evaluating the Influence of GAI on Government Policy Exploring the Role of Generative AI in Shaping National Technology Sovereignty and Informed Governance Policies [J].
Alnahhas, Noor ;
Yousef, Dima .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2024, 2024, :618-626
[40]   AI governance systems: a multi-scale analysis framework, empirical findings, and future directions [J].
Blair Attard-Frost ;
Kelly Lyons .
AI and Ethics, 2025, 5 (3) :2557-2604