Subnational AI policy: shaping AI in a multi-level governance system

被引:10
作者
Liebig, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Guttel, Licinia [1 ,2 ]
Jobin, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Katzenbach, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bremen, Ctr Media Commun & Informat Res, ZeMKI, Linzer Str 4, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[2] Alexander von Humboldt Inst Internet & Soc, Franzosische Str 9, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Artificial intelligence; AI policy; Federalism; Governance; Qualitative analysis; FEDERALISM;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-022-01561-5
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The promises and risks of Artificial Intelligence permeate current policy statements and have attracted much attention by AI governance research. However, most analyses focus exclusively on AI policy on the national and international level, overlooking existing federal governance structures. This is surprising because AI is connected to many policy areas, where the competences are already distributed between the national and subnational level, such as research or economic policy. Addressing this gap, this paper argues that more attention should be dedicated to subnational efforts to shape AI and asks which themes are discussed in subnational AI policy documents with a case study of Germany's 16 states. Our qualitative analysis of 34 AI policy documents issued on the subnational level demonstrates that subnational efforts focus on knowledge transfer between research and industry actors, the commercialization of AI, different economic identities of the German states, and the incorporation of ethical principles. Because federal states play an active role in AI policy, analysing AI as a policy issue on different levels of government is necessary and will contribute to a better understanding of the developments and implementations of AI strategies in different national contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1490
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Governing climate mitigation in a megacity: Tapping opportunities in the multi-level governance system? [J].
Indraprahasta, Galuh Syahbana ;
Amir, Sulfikar ;
Nastiti, Anindrya ;
Ufaira, Rifda .
JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 2025, 47 (06) :2240-2261
[22]   German Subnational Party Unity in Multi-Level Context - Federalism and Party Unity in the German Lander [J].
Schukraft, Stefan .
POLITISCHE VIERTELJAHRESSCHRIFT, 2011, 52 (04) :688-713
[23]   E-Government and Multi-Level Governance: A Comparative examination of Catalonia, Spain, and ontario, Canada [J].
Gasco, Mila ;
Roy, Jeffrey .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2006, 2 (04) :57-75
[24]   MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE OF HYDROPOWER IN CHINA? THE PROBLEM OF TRANSPLANTING A WESTERN CONCEPT INTO THE CHINESE GOVERNANCE CONTEXT [J].
Hensengerth, Oliver .
MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE: THE MISSING LINKAGES, 2015, 4 :295-320
[25]   The costs and benefits of governing in a multi-level system [J].
Scantamburlo, Matthias ;
Vampa, Davide ;
Turner, Ed .
POLITICAL RESEARCH EXCHANGE, 2024, 6 (01)
[26]   Collaboration and coordination strategies for a multi-level AI-enabled healthcare supply chain under disaster [J].
Adhikari, Arnab ;
Joshi, Raunak ;
Basu, Sumanta .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2025, 63 (02) :497-523
[27]   A multi-level factors model affecting teachers' behavioral intention in AI-enabled education ecosystem [J].
Wu, Di ;
Zhang, Xinyan ;
Wang, Kaili ;
Wu, Longkai ;
Yang, Wei .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 73 (01) :135-167
[28]   What's Next for AI Ethics, Policy, and Governance? A Global Overview [J].
Schiff, Daniel ;
Biddle, Justin ;
Borenstein, Jason ;
Laas, Kelly .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY AIES 2020, 2020, :153-158
[29]   AI Governance Network Analysis from the Perspective of US and EU Policy [J].
Liu, Xianrui ;
He, Mengting .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH ACM/IEEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES, JCDL 2024, 2024,
[30]   Networks in EU Multi-level Governance: Concepts and Contributions [J].
Boerzel, Tanja A. ;
Heard-Laureote, Karen .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2009, 29 (02) :135-151