Developing a Robotic General Surgery Training Curriculum: Identifying Key Elements Through a Delphi Process

被引:13
|
作者
Schmiederer, Ingrid S. [1 ]
Torices-Dardon, Arturo [2 ]
Ferrari-Light, Dana M. [2 ]
Abboud, Elia Charbel [3 ]
Villani, Vincenzo [4 ]
Lau, James N. [5 ]
Foglia, Christopher M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Queens, Dept Surg, Flushing, NY USA
[3] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Surg, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; General surgery; Education; Surgical training; ASSISTED PROCEDURES; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; RESIDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.006
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: A national robotic surgery curriculum is still developing for general surgery residents as robotic surgery becomes increasingly accessible. One general surgery residency program utilized a Delphi process to optimize a robotic surgery curriculum and to determine key factors that might affect robotic proficiency and intraoperative independence. DESIGN: Delphi methodology was used to gain consensus amongst robotic surgery faculty and trainees. Consensus was defined as agreement of 66.7% or above in factors that would allow a resident to independently operate in a robotic case. A panel of diverse representatives proposed factors that might affect resident robotic learning and operative experience. In a subsequent round, questions were sent through an anonymous online survey for respondents to identify factors that affect resident robotic independence. Respondents were also given the ability to write in pertinent factors. SETTING: This study was conducted from July 2020 to September 2020 via anonymous web-based questionnaires for education researchers, faculty members, and residents of a university-affiliated independent general surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS: The initial panel consisted of a robotic surgeon, a 2020 graduate, a 2019 graduate and/or robotic fellow, a research resident, and a current resident. The subsequent survey was completed by 8 faculty members, 6 recent graduates, and 15 current residents within the general surgery residency program. RESULTS: Proposed items fell into 3 categories: institutional resources, individual qualities, and curricular elements. Consensus within groups was achieved in the following items: dual robotic console models, roboticfocused faculty, resident interest, PGY level, and resident time spent on a simulator. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi exercise has informed this general surgery residency program in the development of a robotic surgery curriculum, through contribution from multiple stakeholders. While curricular elements for baseline robotic knowledge are necessary, institutional resources, deliberate practice, resident entrustment and faculty teaching proficiency warrant further study. (C) 2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E129 / E136
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Standardized Robotic Training Curriculum in a General Surgery Program
    Moit, Harley
    Dwyer, Anthony
    De Sutter, Michelle
    Heinzel, Sally
    Crawford, David
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2019, 23 (04)
  • [2] Identifying curriculum content for a cross-specialty robotic-assisted surgery training program: a Delphi study
    Peter Hertz
    Kim Houlind
    Jan Jepsen
    Lars Bundgaard
    Pernille Jensen
    Mikkel Friis
    Lars Konge
    Flemming Bjerrum
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 4786 - 4794
  • [3] Identifying curriculum content for a cross-specialty robotic-assisted surgery training program: a Delphi study
    Hertz, Peter
    Houlind, Kim
    Jepsen, Jan
    Bundgaard, Lars
    Jensen, Pernille
    Friis, Mikkel
    Konge, Lars
    Bjerrum, Flemming
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (07): : 4786 - 4794
  • [4] General surgery resident robotic training curriculum: evaluation six years after implementation
    Makope, Audrey N.
    Higgins, Rana M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (02): : 932 - 941
  • [5] The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study
    Ismail, Aemn
    Wood, Matthew
    Ind, Thomas
    Gul, Nahid
    Moss, Esther
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study
    Aemn Ismail
    Matthew Wood
    Thomas Ind
    Nahid Gul
    Esther Moss
    BMC Medical Education, 20
  • [7] Robotic surgery training during general surgery residency: a survey comparing attitudes towards a robotic training curriculum within general surgery, urology, and OBGYN residents and attendings
    Rory Carroll
    Paolo Goffredo
    Garett Steers
    Ibrahim Cetindag
    Ryan Lehmann
    Jennifer Hrabe
    Imran Hassan
    Julia Shelton
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 1105 - 1110
  • [8] Robotic surgery training during general surgery residency: a survey comparing attitudes towards a robotic training curriculum within general surgery, urology, and OBGYN residents and attendings
    Carroll, Rory
    Goffredo, Paolo
    Steers, Garett
    Cetindag, Ibrahim
    Lehmann, Ryan
    Hrabe, Jennifer
    Hassan, Imran
    Shelton, Julia
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (05) : 1105 - 1110
  • [9] Gamification in medical education: identifying and prioritizing key elements through Delphi method
    Wang, Yung-Fu
    Hsu, Ya-Fang
    Fang, Kwo-Ting
    Kuo, Liang-Tseng
    MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2024, 29 (01):
  • [10] A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education
    Chen, Richard
    Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues
    Krause, Crystal
    Siu, Ka-Chun
    Oleynikov, Dmitry
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (01): : 361 - 367