Predictive soil mapping with limited sample data

被引:121
作者
Zhu, A. X. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, J. [3 ]
Du, F. [3 ]
Zhang, S. J. [2 ]
Qin, C. Z. [2 ]
Burt, J. [3 ]
Behrens, T. [4 ]
Scholten, T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Geog, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Univ Tubingen, Inst Geog, Phys Geog, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/ejss.12244
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Existing predictive soil mapping (PSM) methods often require soil sample data to be sufficient to represent soil-environment relationships throughout the study area. However, in many parts of the world with only a limited quantity of soil sample data to represent the study area, this is still an issue for PSM application. This paper presents a method, named individual predictive soil mapping' (iPSM), which can make use of limited soil sample data for PSM. With the assumption that similar environmental conditions have similar soils, iPSM uses the soil-environment relationship at each individual soil sample location to predict soil properties at unvisited locations and estimate prediction uncertainty. Specifically, the environmental similarities of an unvisited location to a set of soil sample locations are used in a weighted average method to integrate the soil-environment relationships at sample locations for prediction and uncertainty estimation. As a case study, iPSM was applied to map soil organic matter (SOM) content (%) in the topsoil layer using two sets of soil samples. Compared with multiple linear regression (MLR), iPSM produced a more accurate SOM map (root mean squared error (RMSE) 1.43, mean absolute error (MAE) 1.16) than MLR (RMSE 8.54, MAE 7.34) the ability of the sample set to represent the study area is limited and achieved a comparable accuracy (RMSE 1.10, MAE 0.69) with MLR (RMSE 1.01, MAE 0.73) when the sample set could represent the study area better. In addition, the prediction uncertainty estimated by iPSM was positively related to prediction residuals in both scenarios. This study demonstrates that iPSM is an effective alternative when existing soil samples are limited in their ability to represent the study area and the prediction uncertainty in iPSM can be used as an indicator of its prediction accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 547
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   A methodology for assessing sample representativeness [J].
Ramsey, CA ;
Hewitt, AD .
ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSICS, 2005, 6 (01) :71-75
[22]   Predictive soil mapping: a review [J].
Scull, P ;
Franklin, J ;
Chadwick, OA ;
McArthur, D .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 27 (02) :171-197
[23]  
Shi X, 2004, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V68, P885, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2004.0885
[24]   ON THE THEORY OF SCALES OF MEASUREMENT [J].
STEVENS, SS .
SCIENCE, 1946, 103 (2684) :677-680
[25]   On the origin of the theory of mineral nutrition of plants and the law of the minimum [J].
van der Ploeg, RR ;
Böhm, W ;
Kirkham, MB .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1999, 63 (05) :1055-1062
[26]   Constrained optimization of spatial sampling using continuous simulated annealing [J].
van Groenigen, JW ;
Stein, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1998, 27 (05) :1078-1086
[27]  
Yang Lin Yang Lin, 2007, Acta Pedologica Sinica, V44, P784
[28]  
Zhu A.X., 1994, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, V20, P408, DOI DOI 10.1080/07038992.1994.10874583
[29]   Purposive Sampling for Digital Soil Mapping for Areas with Limited Data [J].
Zhu, A. Xing ;
Yang, Lin ;
Li, Baolin ;
Qin, Chengzhi ;
English, Edward ;
Burt, James E. ;
Zhou, Chenghu .
DIGITAL SOIL MAPPING WITH LIMITED DATA, 2008, :233-+
[30]   Differentiation of Soil Conditions over Low Relief Areas Using Feedback Dynamic Patterns [J].
Zhu, A-Xing ;
Liu, Feng ;
Li, Baolin ;
Pei, Tao ;
Qin, Chengzhi ;
Liu, Gaohuan ;
Wang, Yingjie ;
Chen, Yaning ;
Ma, Xingwang ;
Qi, Feng ;
Zhou, Chenghu .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2010, 74 (03) :861-869