Foreign direct investment and manufacturing pollution emissions: A perspective from heterogeneous environmental regulation

被引:41
作者
Sun, Haibo [1 ]
Liu, Zhonglu [2 ]
Chen, Yingchao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Yantai, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Technol & Business Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Financial Serv Transformat, Sch Finance, 191 Binhai Middle Rd, Yantai, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
FDI; heterogeneous environmental regulation; manufacturing industry; sustainable development; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; CHINA; COUNTRIES; QUALITY; GROWTH; IMPACT; POLICY; INCOME; TRADE; FDI;
D O I
10.1002/sd.2091
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Sustainable development has become the consensus of mankind. Reducing manufacturing pollution emissions is critical to manufacturing sustainability. This article explores the influence of heterogeneous environmental regulation and foreign direct investment (FDI) on manufacturing pollution emissions, based on the micro data of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The results show that FDI significantly increases manufacturing pollution emissions, and both expenditure-style environmental regulation and investment-style environmental regulation have an inverted U-shaped relationship with manufacturing pollution emissions. Moreover, the expenditure-style environmental regulation can only restrain the manufacturing pollution emissions caused by FDI in the current period, while the investment-style environmental regulation is not only effective in the current period, but also plays a role in the lag period. Further research finds that both expenditure-style environmental regulation and investment-style environmental regulation have significant industrial and regional heterogeneity in reducing manufacturing pollution emissions caused by FDI. Our findings provide a reference for the rational introduction of foreign capital and manufacturing industry sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:1376 / 1387
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Bai J., 2017, RD Management, V29, P131, DOI DOI 10.13581/J.CNKI.RDM.2017.03.012
[2]  
Birdsall N., 1993, J Environ Dev, V2, P137, DOI [DOI 10.1177/107049659300200107, 10.1177/107049659300200107]
[3]   Clean technological change in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather tanning [J].
Blackman, Allen ;
Kildegaard, Arne .
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY STUDIES, 2010, 12 (03) :115-132
[4]   A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy [J].
Boecher, Michael .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2012, 16 :14-22
[5]   Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing [J].
Brandt, Loren ;
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes ;
Zhang, Yifan .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 97 (02) :339-351
[6]   Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea [J].
Chung, Sunghoon .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2014, 108 :222-236
[7]   Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector [J].
Cole, MA ;
Elliott, RJR ;
Shimamoto, K .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 50 (01) :121-143
[8]   Trade, growth, and the environment [J].
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2004, 42 (01) :7-71
[9]   Mitigation pathways toward sustainable development: Is there any trade-off between environmental regulation and carbon emissions reduction? [J].
Danish ;
Ulucak, Recep ;
Khan, Salah Ud-Din ;
Baloch, Muhammad Awais ;
Li, Nan .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 28 (04) :813-822
[10]   Market-Based Emissions Regulation and Industry Dynamics [J].
Fowlie, Meredith ;
Reguant, Mar ;
Ryan, Stephen P. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 124 (01) :249-302