Procedures and the professional: the case of the British NHS

被引:53
作者
Lawton, R [1 ]
Parker, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Psychol, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
protocols; procedures; risk; professional autonomy;
D O I
10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00345-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The introduction of procedures to guide medical practice is a growing phenomenon in the British National Health Service. It is thought to be a useful way of managing risk, standardising practice and ensuring that research evidence is incorporated into patient care. However, the mere development and introduction of procedures does not ensure that they are actually followed. In the research reported here focus group methodology was used to investigate the perceptions and opinions of doctors, nurses, midwives and health service managers. Twenty-four focus groups were convened across three hospitals, with discussion focusing on the purpose, development and implementation of clinical protocols. The effect of proceduralisation on professional autonomy and on the working relationships among professional groups also emerged as important themes. The paper concludes that successful implementation of protocols or guidelines in the NHS depends on achieving the right balance between standardising practice and allowing professionals to use clinical judgement. Successful implementation of clinical guidelines also requires that the culture of the health service and the beliefs, attitudes and norms of its employees are taken into account. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 361
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [11] HUNTER DJ, 1994, CHALLENGING MED, P1
  • [12] Guidelines and quality of clinical services in the new NHS
    Kleijnen, J
    Bonsel, G
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7127) : 299 - 300
  • [13] Knodel J., 1993, Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art, P35, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781483349008, 10.4135/9781483349008, DOI 10.4135/9781483349008.N3]
  • [14] LLOYD B, 1995, MANAGING RISK APR, P5
  • [15] DO PRACTICE GUIDELINES GUIDE PRACTICE - THE EFFECT OF A CONSENSUS STATEMENT ON THE PRACTICE OF PHYSICIANS
    LOMAS, J
    ANDERSON, GM
    DOMNICKPIERRE, K
    VAYDA, E
    ENKIN, MW
    HANNAH, WJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 321 (19) : 1306 - 1311
  • [16] ANESTHETIC MACHINE CHECKING PRACTICES - A SURVEY
    MAYOR, AH
    EATON, JM
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 47 (10) : 866 - 868
  • [17] FRAMEWORK FOR COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS
    PERROW, C
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1967, 32 (02) : 194 - 208
  • [18] REASON J, IN PRESS J ORG OCCUP
  • [19] Changing the clinical behaviour of doctors: A psychological framework
    Robertson, N
    Baker, R
    Hearnshaw, H
    [J]. QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 5 (01): : 51 - 54
  • [20] Seidel J., 1988, ETHNOGRAPH USERS GUI