Trade openness, economic growth, and energy intensity in China

被引:100
作者
Chen, Suisui [1 ]
Zhang, Hongyan [1 ]
Wang, Shuhong [2 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Sch Econ, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Marine Econ & Management, Jinan, Peoples R China
关键词
Trade openness; Economic growth; Energy intensity; Regional analysis; Dynamic panel model; CONSERVATION; CONSUMPTION; EMISSIONS; INDUSTRY; INVESTMENT; NEXUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121608
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The growing demand for energy and the associated pressure of environmental pollution has drawn considerable attention from the Chinese government. Reducing energy intensity in maintaining economic growth has positive implications for China's future green transformation. We systematically examine energy-intensive factors in the context of provincial and regional development in China, at both theoretical and empirical levels. We estimate the energy intensity of 30 provinces and regions in the Chinesemainland from 2005 to 2018 and provide a normative interpretation of the impact of trade openness and economic growth on China's energy intensity using a dynamic panel model. Economic growth and trade openness reduce energy intensity when control variables are included; however, the effect of economic growth on energy intensity is more obvious. Foreign trade affects energy intensity mainly through the export route, while the effect of the import route is not significant. The regional variability of the effect of trade openness and economic growth on energy intensity is insignificant between the east and west of China. Accordingly, to reduce energy intensity and coordinate their development, the government should play an active role in opening trade and economic growth. Additionally, a synergistic mechanism of energy control between provinces and regions is necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Business cycle and economic-wide energy intensity: The implications for energy conservation policy in Algeria
    Adom, Philip Kofi
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 88 : 334 - 350
  • [2] Re-exploring the Trade and Environment Nexus Through the Diffusion of Pollution
    Aklin, Michael
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 64 (04) : 663 - 682
  • [3] Does trade liberalization increase national energy use?
    Cole, MA
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2006, 92 (01) : 108 - 112
  • [4] Economic growth, energy intensity and the energy mix
    Diaz, Antonia
    Marrero, Gustavo A.
    Puch, Luis A.
    Rodriguez, Jesus
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 : 1056 - 1077
  • [5] Energy intensity and energy conservation potential in China: A regional comparison perspective
    Dong, Kangyin
    Sun, Renjin
    Hochman, Gal
    Li, Hui
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 155 : 782 - 795
  • [6] Understanding the rapid growth of China's energy consumption: A comprehensive decomposition framework
    Du, Kerui
    Lin, Boqiang
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 90 : 570 - 577
  • [7] The heterogeneity of China's pathways to economic growth, energy conservation and climate mitigation
    Feng, Chao
    Wang, Miao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 228 : 594 - 605
  • [8] Structural decline in China's CO2 emissions through transitions in industry and energy systems
    Guan, Dabo
    Meng, Jing
    Reiner, David M.
    Zhang, Ning
    Shan, Yuli
    Mi, Zhifu
    Shao, Shuai
    Liu, Zhu
    Zhang, Qiang
    Davis, Steven J.
    [J]. NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2018, 11 (08) : 551 - +
  • [9] Three-level decoupling of energy use in Portugal 1995-2010
    Guevara, Zeus
    Domingos, Tiago
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 108 : 134 - 142
  • [10] Energy intensity and investment ownership across Chinese provinces
    Herrerias, M. J.
    Cuadros, A.
    Orts, V.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 : 286 - 298